Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (71636)	3/7/2011 7:13:54 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 218080

let me make sure i understood your points, and i paraphrase <<Of your revisionist BS? Certainly.. If you can show me where [golan/gaza] Tibet was a threat to [israel/palestine] China's sovereignty, I could accept the PRC's presence in Tibet. But you can't. [except the great game history google.com water google.com ] You see, even during the Korean War, the Chinese didn't stay in N. Korea [and rightly so because n.korea is not a part of china] But they remain in Tibet for some reason [because tibet population is chinese who settled there over the biblical times and later] Why didn't China annex N. Korea? [or iceland?] ... i guess for the same reasons to do with rule of law]<.b>>> ... yes?