SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (101193)3/8/2011 9:31:59 AM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224779
 
University denies attack on GOP candidate's children
But prof says colleagues are sacking 3 grad students at bidding of Democrats
March 07, 2011
By Art Moore
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
wnd.com

Oregon State University is denying a charge by Republican congressional candidate Art Robinson that university administration and faculty members are threatening to terminate three of his adult children from its nuclear physics program because of political influence from the "Democrat political machine" led by his 2010 opponent, Rep. Peter Fazio.

"The university has found no factual basis for the accusations made against those faculty members," the Corvallis-based university said in a statement. "OSU is proud of its education and research programs and faculty in Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics and of department alumni, many of whom hold leadership positions in government and private sector organizations."

Robinson, who plans to challenge DeFazio again in 2012 after losing 54.5 percent to 43.6 percent, made his case in a commentary published yesterday by WND.

In its statement, the university insisted it could not comment on any matters regarding a student, because federal law requires that it receive the student's permission.

"Given that, OSU will not comment on any allegation regarding the Robinson students or share any personal information concerning them other than the limited 'directory information' allowed by law to be shared," the university stated.

OSU also said it "will not comment on other allegations made in the Robinson posts other than to say the claims made therein are baseless and without merit."

University spokesman Todd Simmons told WND he had nothing to say beyond the university's official statement.

Asked for his reaction, Robinson told WND the university is hiding behind its statement.

"It's as if somebody shoots someone, and we saw it, but they say our statements are not true," he said.

In his commentary yesterday, Robinson said he was warned by OSU Nuclear Physics Professor Jack Higginbotham that faculty administrators at OSU were "working to make certain that Joshua, his sister Bethany and, if possible, his brother Matthew never receive Ph.D. degrees in nuclear engineering from OSU, regardless of their examination, academic and research performance."

Higginbotham could not be reached for comment.

Robinson, an accomplished chemical scientist who homeschooled his six children after his wife died in 1988, says the university is now trying to strip Higginbotham of his faculty position and his research grants.

"His career now potentially in ruins, he is fighting back in hopes of saving himself and the positions of the students and staff who depend upon him at OSU and who may also lose their careers as collateral damage in these astonishing events," Robinson said in his commentary.

Noting OSU received a reported $27 million in earmark funding from DeFazio and his Democratic colleagues during the last congressional session, Robinson wrote, "Knowledgeable observers have concluded that orders for the attacks on the Robinson students are coming from sources far above Ray in the Democrat political machine."

Robinson said two professors in the nuclear physics department David Hamby – a Democrat activist who has held six political positions – and Kathryn Higley plan to expel his son Joshua, a four-year Ph.D. student, at the end of the current academic term, March 18.

Higley has informed Joshua, he said, that the prompt neutron activation analysis facility Joshua built for his thesis work and all of his work in progress will be turned over to Higley's husband, Steven Reese, who is also a faculty member.

Meanwhile, faculty member Todd Palmer has notified his daughter Bethany, a four-year Ph.D. student with a 3.89 grade-point average, that he is terminating her thesis work and taking all of her work in progress for himself.

Palmer, according to Robinson, claimed Bethany didn't keep up with her work because she took leave to campaign for her father. But Robinson said Bethany didn't campaign for him and successfully completed her required doctoral work.

Robinson said if the "attack" on Professor Higginbotham is not stopped, it may also destroy the graduate work of his student, Robinson's son Matthew, who has a grade-point average of 3.91.

Robinson said the battle has been going on since November, just two days after the election.

"I considered an immediate public exposure of this plot and warned the faculty of this possibility, but instead my family and I decided to try to prevent a scandal at OSU and save the students within the confines of OSU," he explained. "We fought these unprincipled academics on their own ground and held them off for four months. That effort is, however, now failing, and Joshua and Bethany are both slated for dismissal from the department of nuclear engineering very soon."

As WND reported, DeFazio ran against his own party in 2010 and characterized Robinson as an extremist, unfit for the geographically large southwest Oregon district that includes the left-leaning state university towns of Eugene and Corvallis along with conservative rural communities.

A tea party favorite, Robinson drew strong grass-roots support, with observers remarking they hadn't "seen a campaign like this for a generation."

While DeFazio, who has won 13 terms, captured 82 percent of the vote in 2008, Robinson believed signs were pointing toward a possible upset in 2010. But he claims a TV and radio "smear campaign"– based on outright lies and fabrications – cast enough doubt about him to cause some independents to reconsider their support.

Robinson said that with experience under his belt, he plans to challenge DeFazio again next year.



To: lorne who wrote (101193)3/8/2011 11:42:02 AM
From: Carolyn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224779
 
They are so, so low. Unbelievable.



To: lorne who wrote (101193)3/8/2011 6:01:07 PM
From: CF Rebel1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224779
 
This is about as bad a thing I've read the last two years. This is exactly how the Soviet Union was run, along with all other communist governments. Oregon State University may as well be renamed Commies-R-Us. When they're pissed at someone, they attack the person's family.

Art Robinson has raised a truly gifted family and to see this going on should get the attention of Congress, the useless Justice Department and Fox News. This has to go national.

This country needs more people like the Robinson family, not the scum that inhabit the faculty and ooze around the OSU campus.

May every perpetrator of this OUTRAGE find jail time including Rep. DeFazio if he can be demonstrated as the source of these heinous acts.

CF Rebel



To: lorne who wrote (101193)3/8/2011 6:15:04 PM
From: CF Rebel1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224779
 
Here's a flaccid Oregon State University rebuttal to Art Robinson as they hide behind the "law:"

Statement regarding Internet postings by Art Robinson
3-7-11

oregonstate.edu

CORVALLIS, Ore. -- Political candidate Art Robinson published material this past weekend with regard to the status of two of his adult sons and one adult daughter who are graduate students in Oregon State University’s Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics. Robinson made a number of allegations with regard to the students’ experience at OSU and further allegations regarding the university’s relationship with U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio.

Federal law prohibits institutions of higher education from discussing matters concerning our students with anyone other than the student himself or herself without the express consent of the student involved. Given that, OSU will not comment on any allegation regarding the Robinson students or share any personal information concerning them other than the limited “directory information” allowed by law to be shared.

Robinson’s material singles out several individual faculty members for criticism. The university has found no factual basis for the accusations made against those faculty members. OSU is proud of its education and research programs and faculty in Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics and of department alumni, many of whom hold leadership positions in government and private sector organizations.

OSU will not comment on other allegations made in the Robinson posts other than to say the claims made therein are baseless and without merit.

As a leading public university ranked highly for its graduate student success as well as research and instructional efforts in the Dept. of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics, OSU is dedicated to excellence in its teaching, service and research missions. OSU graduate students enjoy a wide range of resources to facilitate their success academically and personally. University processes for graduate students who are experiencing difficulty in school or with personal matters are well established and readily available to every member of our graduate student body.

The relationships between graduate students and OSU faculty are highly collaborative, involving adult-to-adult communication and scientific problem solving. In each of those relationships, expectations for each party reflect the time-tested academic traditions of America’s more than 3,000 institutions of higher education.

OSU graduates nearly 1,000 graduate students each year, about one-third of whom earn doctoral or terminal degrees. For many generations, those students have typically progressed to success in the private sector, careers in public service or work within academia.

Finally, OSU works closely and routinely with elected officials at the federal, state and local level, as well as their staff members. In all of these dealings, the university adheres to the highest ethical and professional standards and follows all appropriate laws governing the conduct of public universities and their representatives with governmental representatives. Any allegation to the contrary is unfounded.

About Oregon State University: OSU is one of only two U.S. universities designated a land-, sea-, space- and sun-grant institution. OSU is also Oregon’s only university to hold both the Carnegie Foundation’s top designation for research institutions and its prestigious Community Engagement classification. Its nearly 24,000 students come from all 50 states and more than 90 nations. OSU programs touch every county within Oregon, and its faculty teach and conduct research on issues of national and global importance.



To: lorne who wrote (101193)3/8/2011 6:35:08 PM
From: CF Rebel3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224779
 
OSU's vendetta against Art Robinson may also have roots in his Petition Project in which he countered the elitist global warming dogma.

stkarnick.com

Has ClimateGate Metastasized - Payback at OSU?

By Mike Gray

If Art Robinson‘s allegations are true, this could spin into a major scandal. Robinson ran against Peter DeFazio and lost last fall:

"On Nov. 4, 2010, as soon as the election results were in and they were sure their candidate had won, faculty administrators at Oregon State University gave new meaning to the term “political payback.”

"They initiated an attack on my three children - Joshua, Bethany and Matthew - for the purpose of throwing them all out of the OSU graduate school, despite their outstanding academic and research accomplishments. OSU is a liberal socialist Democrat stronghold in Oregon that received a reported $27 million in earmark funding from my opponent, Peter DeFazio, and his Democrat colleagues during the last legislative session."

But besides partisan politics, there may be-although this is only speculation at the moment-a tie-in with the controversy over climate change; you may have forgotten that Robinson

"...directed the Petition Project, which has obtained the support and signatures of more than 31,000 American scientists for a petition opposed - entirely on scientific grounds published in peer reviewed journals - to the hypothesis of “human-caused global warming.” [From WND]"

Robinson’s version of events is on WorldNetDaily here. The Petition Project is here. And an HTML version of Robinson et al‘s conclusions concerning global effects of carbon dioxide is here (also available as PDFs). The paper’s abstract says:

"A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate. Increased carbon dioxide has, however, markedly increased plant growth. Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in hydrocarbon use and minor greenhouse gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge. The environmental effects of rapid expansion of the nuclear and hydrocarbon energy industries are discussed."

...and concludes:

"There are no experimental data to support the hypothesis that increases in human hydrocarbon use or in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are causing or can be expected to cause unfavorable changes in global temperatures, weather, or landscape. There is no reason to limit human production of CO2, CH4, and other minor greenhouse gases as has been proposed.

"We also need not worry about environmental calamities even if the current natural warming trend continues. The Earth has been much warmer during the past 3,000 years without catastrophic effects. Warmer weather extends growing seasons and generally improves the habitability of colder regions.

"As coal, oil, and natural gas are used to feed and lift from poverty vast numbers of people across the globe, more CO2 will be released into the atmosphere. This will help to maintain and improve the health, longevity, prosperity, and productivity of all people.

"The United States and other countries need to produce more energy, not less. The most practical, economical, and environmentally sound methods available are hydrocarbon and nuclear technologies.

"Human use of coal, oil, and natural gas has not harmfully warmed the Earth, and the extrapolation of current trends shows that it will not do so in the foreseeable future. The CO2 produced does, however, accelerate the growth rates of plants and also permits plants to grow in drier regions. Animal life, which depends upon plants, also flourishes, and the diversity of plant and animal life is increased.

"Human activities are producing part of the rise in CO2 in the atmosphere. Mankind is moving the carbon in coal, oil, and natural gas from below ground to the atmosphere, where it is available for conversion into living things. We are living in an increasingly lush environment of plants and animals as a result of this CO2 increase. Our children will therefore enjoy an Earth with far more plant and animal life than that with which we now are blessed."

In some circles, such global warming denial optimism warrants retaliation.