Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (71715)	3/8/2011 10:15:04 AM
From: Tom Daly	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217544

Subject: False Accusations of Hate Speech. Yes, the Tibet issue is closed but your accusations of my writing hate messages is not. Twice, so far, I have asked you to point out specifically where I wrote hate messages. Twice, so far, you have replied without providing such specifics and have jumped off on tangential issues. I'm still waiting, as are all who read your public false accusation. Message 27219068 You are in violation of the SI TOU & I would like you to publicly retract that false accusation.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (71715)	3/8/2011 10:33:05 AM
From: Tom Daly	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217544

So, this is your explanation of why you think I wrote hate messages? Were you not obliquely advocating that the late-arrival Chinese to be ejected from Tibet? If so, by proxy, hate, as it relates to israel per discussion point and as it relates to late-arrival Chinese. In answer to the first part of the above, no I never directly or obliquely advocated anything like that and you know I didn't. Your attempt to imply I did "obliquely" is a weak attempt to support this explanation. You still have not pointed our specifics of the hate speech you falsely & publicly accused me of. You can't because there was no hate speech.