SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (101258)3/9/2011 9:14:16 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224858
 
Message 27223908



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (101258)3/10/2011 7:59:07 AM
From: lorne4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224858
 
Who's crazier – Charlie Sheen or the left wing?
: March 10, 2011
Larry Elder
wnd.com

Charlie Sheen, at least, has an excuse. He's on a drug he calls "Charlie Sheen."

But what powerful hallucinogen inhaled by the left induces the mental fantasy that makes them believe:

Spending nearly a trillion dollars in "stimulus" money "created or saved" 3.5 million jobs?

A "tax cut" means giving checks to the nearly 40 percent of the workforce that pays no federal income taxes?

Racism drives the tea party/conservative/right-wing criticism of a left-wing black president – who received more of the white vote than John Kerry, in every age demographic, and who at one time enjoyed an approval rating of almost 70 percent?

Government can "invest" in "green jobs of the future" better than can the private sector, can pick winners and losers better than the marketplace, and can do this while not rewarding those with political influence or punishing those without it?

The rich pay no taxes – even though the top 1 percent of income-earners pay nearly 40 percent of all federal income taxes?

Why do modern liberals think and act as they do? Find out in Dr. Lyle Rossiter's book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness."

Tax cuts only benefit the rich – even though they disproportionately pay the income taxes (see above)?

Federal and state budget problems can be solved by simply raising taxes on "the rich" and making them pay "their fair share"?

Governors' attempts to rein in public-sector compensation – because it vastly exceeds the private-sector counterparts – constitute an "assault" on "all unions"?

Expensive, anti-competitive, job-killing "global warming" regulations imposed on U.S. businesses can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions – even though the No. 1 and No. 4 "polluters," China and India, respectively, say, "Go to hell, we're growing our economies"?

Obamacare adds 30 million uninsured to the insured; allows people to keep their doctor or health insurance; forces health insurance companies to "insure" applicants with pre-existing illnesses – all while saving money, lowering costs and retaining the same quality?

President Barack Obama presented a "fiscally responsible" 2012 budget – even though it adds to the debt, continues high annual deficits and changes nothing about the three autopilot entitlement programs, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid?

"Greed" and lack of Wall Street regulation caused the housing meltdown – even though the Community Reinvestment Act, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and the Federal Housing Administration distorted behavior; pressured lenders to give loans to the "underrepresented"; incentivized people who should have been renting to buy homes; and put taxpayers on the hook for the losses?

"Obamacare" is a racist and offensive word – but not "Romneycare" or Hillarycare"?

The Muslim Brotherhood is "primarily secular"?

Health care is a "right" – but keeping a handgun in your own home should be a crime?

Public education can be fixed by spending more money – without allowing greater parental choice and more competition against government schools?

If millions of illegal aliens would likely vote Republican, liberals would still support putting them on a pathway to citizenship?

If convicted felons would likely vote Republican, liberals would still push to restore their full "voting rights"?

Right-wing "vitriolic rhetoric" caused the mass shooting in Tucson – but left-wing rhetoric like MSNBC's Chris Matthews' description of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as "a car bomber" does no damage?

The Bush tax cuts for the rich "caused the deficit" – even though Obama says maintaining the current rates for the top 2 percent of income-earners "costs" $700 billion over 10 years, or for each year, less than 5 percent of the current annual deficit?

The war in Iraq caused the deficit – even though the combined annual costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars represent about 10 percent of the current annual deficit?

President George W. Bush and his policies made America hated in the Middle East – even though polls show the Egyptians have a lower opinion of America under Obama than they did under Bush?

Obama can convince Iran from continuing its nuclear weapons programs – by criticizing Israel for building "settlements," and by breaking missile-defense promises made to the Czech Republic and Poland to get Russia's help in pressuring Iran?

Bush "admitted committing torture" by approving waterboarding and is, therefore, a confessed "war criminal"?

Questioning Obama's place of birth or religion is insanity – but not believing that "Bush lied, people died"; Bush had prior knowledge of 9/11; Bush allowed America to be attacked on 9/11 to provide a pretext for war in Iraq; 9/11 was a government-involved inside job; and that WTC Building 7 imploded from planted explosives?

Bush governed as an evil, civil liberty-crushing warmonger – even though Obama continues the same war on terror programs and policies, including the use of the "state secrets" courtroom defense to prevent national-security-sensitive documents from being turned over to the defense; rendition; the terrorist surveillance program; the Patriot Act, including the despised library provision; drone attacks in Pakistan; and the continued use of Guantanamo Bay prison?

Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to reduce the influence of lobbyists – while members of his administration hold meetings off White House premises to avoid the requirement of having to keep a record of the meetings?

So here's the question. As between Charlie Sheen and the nonsense-believing left-wingers, who should be drug tested?

Charlie Sheen, at least, has an excuse. He's on a drug he calls "Charlie Sheen."

But what powerful hallucinogen inhaled by the left induces the mental fantasy that makes them believe:

Spending nearly a trillion dollars in "stimulus" money "created or saved" 3.5 million jobs?

A "tax cut" means giving checks to the nearly 40 percent of the workforce that pays no federal income taxes?

Racism drives the tea party/conservative/right-wing criticism of a left-wing black president – who received more of the white vote than John Kerry, in every age demographic, and who at one time enjoyed an approval rating of almost 70 percent?

Government can "invest" in "green jobs of the future" better than can the private sector, can pick winners and losers better than the marketplace, and can do this while not rewarding those with political influence or punishing those without it?

The rich pay no taxes – even though the top 1 percent of income-earners pay nearly 40 percent of all federal income taxes?

Tax cuts only benefit the rich – even though they disproportionately pay the income taxes (see above)?

Federal and state budget problems can be solved by simply raising taxes on "the rich" and making them pay "their fair share"?

Governors' attempts to rein in public-sector compensation – because it vastly exceeds the private-sector counterparts – constitute an "assault" on "all unions"?

Expensive, anti-competitive, job-killing "global warming" regulations imposed on U.S. businesses can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions – even though the No. 1 and No. 4 "polluters," China and India, respectively, say, "Go to hell, we're growing our economies"?

Obamacare adds 30 million uninsured to the insured; allows people to keep their doctor or health insurance; forces health insurance companies to "insure" applicants with pre-existing illnesses – all while saving money, lowering costs and retaining the same quality?

President Barack Obama presented a "fiscally responsible" 2012 budget – even though it adds to the debt, continues high annual deficits and changes nothing about the three autopilot entitlement programs, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid?

"Greed" and lack of Wall Street regulation caused the housing meltdown – even though the Community Reinvestment Act, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and the Federal Housing Administration distorted behavior; pressured lenders to give loans to the "underrepresented"; incentivized people who should have been renting to buy homes; and put taxpayers on the hook for the losses?

"Obamacare" is a racist and offensive word – but not "Romneycare" or Hillarycare"?

The Muslim Brotherhood is "primarily secular"?

Health care is a "right" – but keeping a handgun in your own home should be a crime?

Public education can be fixed by spending more money – without allowing greater parental choice and more competition against government schools?

If millions of illegal aliens would likely vote Republican, liberals would still support putting them on a pathway to citizenship?

If convicted felons would likely vote Republican, liberals would still push to restore their full "voting rights"?

Right-wing "vitriolic rhetoric" caused the mass shooting in Tucson – but left-wing rhetoric like MSNBC's Chris Matthews' description of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich as "a car bomber" does no damage?

The Bush tax cuts for the rich "caused the deficit" – even though Obama says maintaining the current rates for the top 2 percent of income-earners "costs" $700 billion over 10 years, or for each year, less than 5 percent of the current annual deficit?

The war in Iraq caused the deficit – even though the combined annual costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars represent about 10 percent of the current annual deficit?

President George W. Bush and his policies made America hated in the Middle East – even though polls show the Egyptians have a lower opinion of America under Obama than they did under Bush?

Obama can convince Iran from continuing its nuclear weapons programs – by criticizing Israel for building "settlements," and by breaking missile-defense promises made to the Czech Republic and Poland to get Russia's help in pressuring Iran?

Bush "admitted committing torture" by approving waterboarding and is, therefore, a confessed "war criminal"?

Questioning Obama's place of birth or religion is insanity – but not believing that "Bush lied, people died"; Bush had prior knowledge of 9/11; Bush allowed America to be attacked on 9/11 to provide a pretext for war in Iraq; 9/11 was a government-involved inside job; and that WTC Building 7 imploded from planted explosives?

Bush governed as an evil, civil liberty-crushing warmonger – even though Obama continues the same war on terror programs and policies, including the use of the "state secrets" courtroom defense to prevent national-security-sensitive documents from being turned over to the defense; rendition; the terrorist surveillance program; the Patriot Act, including the despised library provision; drone attacks in Pakistan; and the continued use of Guantanamo Bay prison?

Obama fulfilled his campaign promise to reduce the influence of lobbyists – while members of his administration hold meetings off White House premises to avoid the requirement of having to keep a record of the meetings?

So here's the question. As between Charlie Sheen and the nonsense-believing left-wingers, who should be drug tested?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (101258)3/10/2011 8:35:49 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224858
 
DATA SNAP: US Jobless Claims +26K To 397K Last Week; Survey +7KLast update: 3/10/2011 8:30:00 AM By Luca Di Leo and Jeffrey Sparshott
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--New jobless claims last week rose more than expected, but the level remained consistent with a slowly improving labor market. Initial jobless claims rose by 26,000 to 397,000 in the week ended March 5, the Labor Department said Thursday in its weekly report. The prior week's figures -- when claims fell to the lowest level in almost three years -- were revised up slightly, to 371,000 from an original estimate of 368,000. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires had forecast claims would rise by only 7,000 in the week ending March 5. New claims figures have been more volatile than usual at the start of the year due to unusually severe winter weather in January. But in the last three weeks, claims have remained under 400,000, widely considered the point at which the economy is gaining more jobs than it's shedding. The four-week moving average of new claims, considered a more reliable indicator because it smoothes out volatile data, rose 3,000 to 392,250 in the week ending March 5. A Labor Department economist said there were no unusual factors in the latest data. Strong hiring in February pushed the U.S. unemployment rate down to 8.9%, the lowest level in nearly two years. Employers rebounded from a harsh winter to add 192,000 jobs to nonfarm payrolls last month as strong private-sector gains in manufacturing and service industries more than offset accelerating layoffs by state and local governments. Still, the hole caused by the recent recession was so deep that Federal Reserve officials expect the unemployment rate to remain close to 9.0% until the end of the year, and for prices to remain low over the next two years. For these reasons, officials are seen sticking to their easy-money policies at a policy-setting meeting next week, including continued purchases of $600 billion in Treasurys slated to run until June. The Labor Department said in Thursday's report that the number of continuing claims--those drawn by workers for more than a week--fell by 20,000 to 3,771,000 in the week ended Feb. 26. Continuing claims are reported with a one-week lag. The unemployment rate for workers with unemployment insurance was 3.0% in the week ending Feb. 26, unchanged from the previous week. The state-by-state breakdown of new claims, which is also reported with a one-week lag, showed that California had the largest drop in claims--12,730--due to a shorter workweek. Massachusetts reported the largest increase in claims, with an increase of 3,804 due to the impact of school holidays on the transportation and service industries. The Labor Department official said Alaska was the only state for which data was estimated in the latest week. The Labor Department report on jobless claims can be accessed at: dol.gov -By Luca Di Leo and Jeffrey Sparshott, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6682; luca.dileo@dowjones.com (END) Dow Jones NewswiresMarch 10, 2011 08:30 ET (13:30 GMT)