Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveF who wrote (5539)	3/10/2011 7:20:27 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

JOHNSON, Scott 66,000 Message 26416927 Another issue is that I could never agree with is that painting someone with the same brush as others in a particular profession is valid. In other areas of society it creates very real harm. I'm in social services, I always have to stop myself from making assumptions based on initial information until I meet the individual or family, it's always different from what I expect and I do them an injustice if I don't look at their particular strengths and goals. I know many make assumptions about those who work in construction and engineering (I went to the University of Waterloo, couldn't swing a cat without hitting an engineer). I've often heard someone say, "He or she is an engineer" and roll there eyes. That was never my take, they are all unique and all have strengths and weaknesses. The only similar trait I ever saw was that I never met an engineer who could look at a floating soap bubble and not wonder if it was a perfect sphere. I won't paint you with the same brush either. I do appreciate your feedback. Take care. JUSTICE37 siliconinvestor.com

To: SteveF who wrote (5539)	3/10/2011 7:37:59 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

You are correct but the very legal process as to how I "legally" got JBI NV shares, yes, that I am keeping secret, most from the 2008 offering know, it really is nothing earth shattering. JOHNSON, Scott 66,000 Justice37 Share Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:24:35 PM Re: jimmenknee post# 95831 Post # of 95837 Nope. Wrong. Yes it was. You are correct but the very legal process as to how I "legally" got JBI NV shares, yes, that I am keeping secret, most from the 2008 offering know, it really is nothing earth shattering. I work with families that were abandoned by a parent, divorce sometimes is never filed. Don't know if that is the case, however, business, abandoned, no assets, no address, no phone number. You haven't found the current documented proof for some of this. I'm sorry you don't accept what I was told by the company. siliconinvestor.com JOHNSON, Scott 66,000 Item 15. Recent Sales Of Unregistered Securities. We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in September 2007 and 100,000 shares of common stock were issued to Sheila Hunter in consideration for $100. These shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and were issued as founders shares. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the investor had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the 1933 Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for this transaction. In February 2009 we entered into a Stock Purchase and Share Exchange Agreement with John Bordynuik, Inc., (“JBI”) an Ontario Corporation, whereby we exchanged 58,521,250 shares of common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of JBI, to the individuals listed below. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the individuals had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the 1933 Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for this transaction. FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT John Bordynuik, Inc. Filing Date 2009-04-06 sec.gov