SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (603192)3/10/2011 7:03:47 PM
From: d[-_-]b2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573941
 
Go here and do the math yourself:

solar-estimate.org

I could install a system for $137,000 that would supply nearly 50% of my power.

Wow - that's fantastic!



To: bentway who wrote (603192)3/10/2011 8:46:39 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 1573941
 
"How many square meters are AT the equator, you moron!"

Zero....moron. I thought you were an engineer.



To: bentway who wrote (603192)3/10/2011 10:10:35 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573941
 
Bentway, > The amount of solar energy hitting the Earth in one hour

Unless you are advocating covering the entire Earth with solar panels, such a statement is meaningless.

> Where do you GET these crap "facts"?

Your own link said so: "By the time it reaches Earth's surface, the energy in sunlight has fallen to about 1,000 watts per square meter at noon on a cloudless day."

Tenchusatsu



To: bentway who wrote (603192)3/10/2011 10:47:10 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1573941
 
The amount of solar energy hitting the Earth in one hour, if we could perfectly capture it, would power us for a YEAR! Which allows a LOT of inefficiency.

We also wouldn't be able to see anything on moonless nights without artificial lighting, having captured all the natural sunlight.

That's a pretty big if. Why stop at all the energy of the sun hitting the Earth, why not if we could capture the sun's entire output, which is about as likely for the near term future.

The inefficiency applies to the extremely tiny portion of the sunlight hitting the actual solar power cells or mirrors reflecting on to solar thermal generators.

How many square meters are AT the equator

And what percentage of those will ever be covered by solar cells?