Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (17769)	11/13/1997 11:55:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

If Mike were an average investor I'd be inclined to go along with being morally correct. I'd want to do the right thing myself. However Mike is a professional broker and is not only morally bound but is also ethically bound. If he has any concrete information, he should report it to the proper authorities, and to post it here since he spends so much time here. Most people here consider him acting in his professional capacity as a broker here (including myself) Kurt

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (17769)	11/13/1997 11:57:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Al, I'm sure you read this.....but just in case you didn't. --------------------------------- <<If Mike has any concrete information, post it.By not doing so, if this goes south as he claims it will, then he will have helped cause it. He will be just as 'Hated" as the people who created it. If he doesn't reveal the information he claims, then one can assume there is none, as you say.>> ------------------------------- To: KMT (17755 ) From: TopCat Thursday, Nov 13 1997 11:45PM EST Reply #17763 of 17770 KMT, Good post and you might be right. I am just as anxious to see what Mike has as anybody....but, I also think I understand his strategy. Several people have posted information of real substance here only to see it totally ignored or flamed and then ignored. Mike (IMHO) is trying to create a situation where his information cannot be ignored without a complete debate. In the end, he might be "crushed," as he has put it, but not ignored. After all of this, I think that is a reasonable position to take. In a poker game, all participants have to agree to lay down their cards at the same time......Riley, where are you? TC