SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (41761)3/15/2011 10:46:34 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 78564
 
>>Rebuilding Japan

I wonder if something like KUB would work. I mean I have to assume they will need their machinery...



To: Spekulatius who wrote (41761)3/15/2011 11:46:24 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 78564
 
OT - nuclear

IMHO, it is very sad that most of the world will have knee-jerk reaction to nuclear problems in Japan and stop investing in nuclear energy or decommission existing nuclear plants. Nuclear energy is IMHO almost the only viable solution to deal with peak oil crisis, however, it requires long lead time and this is being squandered again and again. The fear is just too high even though percentage/fatality-wise it is totally irrational. But then we do not live on Vulcan. :( I liked Turkish PM who said that they won't stop Russian nuclear power plant construction since everything including gas pipelines have risk. But he's probably the only one who will take such stand. China may also continue (for all the good and bad: Message 27235910 )

I was totally opposed to Lithuanian nuclear power plant closure, not that it mattered. :(

On topic: I am buying EGY, AFL, MHR-C, UFTP. No Japan equities yet, will have to spend some time looking at them in the evening. Maybe I'll just buy EWJ at some point. 20% down from here if it reaches that level?



To: Spekulatius who wrote (41761)3/15/2011 4:25:30 PM
From: Madharry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78564
 
not that i am any expert, but i dont think that because you set up a nuclear facility in a country known to have frequent earthquakes and it backfires when some super earthquake hits that it is now rational not to build them in areas where earthquakes never occur. I would be opposed to building nuclear facilities in japan or califrornia, but when was the last earthquake to hit europe?