Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveF who wrote (5638)	3/15/2011 8:47:53 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

"I'm sure the DEC is on top of this too." siliconinvestor.com Except they don't have any tanks permitted to hold the off-gases.

To: SteveF who wrote (5638)	3/15/2011 9:04:29 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Anyone know who "20 IROQUOIS INC" is and what their business is? Imperial Whazoo Share Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:51:27 PM Re: Ryoko post# 96198 Post # of 96237 Anyone know who "20 IROQUOIS INC" is and what their business is? Did they build the tanks and record them under their name or some such? Or does anyone wonder, as I currently am doing, whether the deal JBII is in the process of cutting with some buyer requires the buyer to take charge of the tank farm? In essense, could JBII be cutting a deal (or have they already done so) where they provide the output to a buyer who is in charge of the tanks? In any event, who is 20 Iriquois and why do they get to build 20 tanks of JBII's land? Imperial Whazoo siliconinvestor.com scion Share Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:57:51 PM Re: Imperial Whazoo post# 96235 Post # of 96237 "20 IROQUOIS INC" siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com --- Anyone know who "20 IROQUOIS INC" is and what their business is? siliconinvestor.com Imperial Whazoo Share Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:58:38 PM Re: Ryoko post# 96205 Post # of 96237 Unless, as a legal technicality, the reason JBII has no responsibility to file such records is that the deal they have cut involves a customer who has the responsibility of managing the tanks. Heck, JBII might have cut a deal where the customer is leasing acerage from JBII and the actual place it will show up is in the balance sheet as rental income. That would explain why they have not filed. The actual owner is the customer who is leasing acerage, and that customer is not a public company, so they are not required to file. Not asserting that this is the situatuation. Just thinking out loud. Imperial Whazoo siliconinvestor.com