Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (5649)	3/16/2011 10:45:54 AM
From: SteveF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

LOL, from exactly one year ago today. JBII closed at $5.00: fourkids_9pets Member Profile fourkids_9pets Member Level Share Tuesday, March 16, 2010 7:47:07 PM Re: MorningLightMountain post# 33210 Post # of 96281 well that is one way to look at it could be that most are just hunkered down patiently waiting out the calendar :) JBII Volume 13,192 Average Volume (10-Day) 24,791 Average Volume (90-Day) 59,679 i personally like these low volume days to add shares on an as needed basis .. and it's always interesting to see what size trades are used to bid whack the pps wink siliconinvestor.com ---------------------------------- Estimated_Prophet Member Level Share Tuesday, March 16, 2010 12:51:13 PM Re: None Post # of 96283 JBII~$4.50-4.70 should be a good accumulation zone going forward if the tide has indeed turned. It may mostly depend upon an uplisting. If not, then it will be extremely important for IsleChem Report to reach a broader audience. The key sign to watch for if JBII is ready to truly breakout should be a break of 5.50. You will hope to see 50k+ volume on that day, and for the bid to quickly move up to 5.50 and stay strong. siliconinvestor.com ---------------------------------- techisbest Member Profile techisbest Share Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:13:25 PM Re: None Post # of 96283 No posts from JB on FB today. Unusual? siliconinvestor.com ---------------------------------- techisbest Share Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:53:30 AM Re: None Post # of 96283 I don't know where John got that $18 number for the next PIPE. Wishful thinking only? How much of the future can be priced into the stock? I agree with rce9rys that the early going will be self-financed. I'm basing that on John's statement regarding when a new PIPE would be offered. He has a lot to prove to get investors to price in that future. I think 5 sites reporting revenues in line with expectations would do it. I think that can be achieved without outside financing. Another reason I think this will be self-financed is the emphasis being placed on making PakIt a revenue generator. There will be a spike in the price once the IsleChem report comes out. There will be a spike in the price once an uplisting happens. I doubt either/both can sustain any spike. The market is forward-looking, but only to the extent that the price can be justified by expected revenues. Right now the expectations are high, allowing the current price without definitive proof. But definitive proof, in the form of generated revenues, will be demanded going forward. I don't think $18 can be sustained without that proof. siliconinvestor.com ---------------------------------- Zardiw Member Level Grandfathered Member Share Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:31:42 AM Re: SteveF post# 33271 Post # of 96284 Last I heard we have institutional support dude.........et z siliconinvestor.com

To: scion who wrote (5649)	3/16/2011 8:31:17 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

10-K: for Fiscal Year Ended 12/31/10 due Thursday, March 31, 2011 secfile.net JBI, INC. CIK#: 0001381105 (see all company filings) sec.gov (b) Engagement of New Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. i On March 10, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed MSCM, LLP (“MSCM”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to engage MSCM was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 10, 2011. ii Prior to March 10, 2011, the Company did not consult with MSCM regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transactions, (2) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, (3) written or oral advice was provided that would be an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or financial reporting issues, or (4) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement between the Company and its predecessor auditor as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) or a reportable event as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. Form 8-K - Filing Date 2011-03-16 sec.gov MSCM LLP 8th Floor, 701 Evans Avenue Toronto, Ontario M9C 1A3 Canada Telephone: (416) 626-6000 Facsimile: (416) 626-8650 E-Mail: info@mscm.ca mscm.ca