Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12217)	3/16/2011 6:40:43 PM
From: ggersh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119361

If your right on the banks then big losers will be all global banks, RE worth zero isn't good?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12217)	3/16/2011 8:22:37 PM
From: yard_man	1 Recommendation Respond to of 119361

Suppose a best case instead: It doesn't become inhabitable -- but certain areas have to be avoided. They have a significant generating capacity deficit right now. The lives lost don't decrease the demand by that much. Also, there will be review of the operations of all teh nuclear plants there and worldwide -- it may slow projects on the drawing board. So, that and all the interruptions in the supply chain due to Japan -- and dealing with the displaced folks will take a very large amount of resources and time. Printing squared will be attempted to support asset prices. The results will be disastrous MUCH more quickly. Bottom line: There aren't ANY winners. We all lose. The economy is global.

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (12217)	3/16/2011 8:26:12 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 119361

China wins big even if Japan does not become uninhabitable. It can supply bldg. materials, etc., for the reconstruction. The 'broken window' bit does not apply to suppliers. They are clearly winners.