SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (12280)3/16/2011 9:59:08 PM
From: neolib1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 119360
 
Some case would have to be made that an "error of design" or "substandard workmanship" contributed to the failure. That will be a very hard case to make under the circumstances.

What do you think the odds are that the design of the fuel storage pool, elevated as it was, and placed within a sealed environment, cleverly designed so if hydrogen did get generated, it could blow up the building, will NOT now be considered nutz, and obvious to anyone but a fool, especially when built on a coast in a high earthquake zone?



To: yard_man who wrote (12280)3/16/2011 10:27:55 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119360
 
Lawsuit doesn't sound right to me either.

Japan is not a litigious society.
More Lawyers in Georgia than Japan

The reactors performed well for 30 years

The meltdown is due to a natural disaster
Not human error.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News