SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (41812)3/17/2011 10:13:33 AM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78974
 
re GFRE - I also noted that despite all their acquisitions, the bromine tonnage YoY was down

Product sold in metric tons

Year ended
December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
Year ended

34,672 34,930





To: Spekulatius who wrote (41812)3/17/2011 1:59:16 PM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 78974
 
I think its more their english that is wrong.

cash is whats on the balance sheet. I Was happy to see that that figure is increasing on the balance sheet and i would be shocked if that number turns out to be fraudulent as you are implying because the easiest thing for a cpa to check and verify and they have been doing that ever since i can remember is to verify the outstanding balances in banks ets by sending out verification statements. now as to why they havent bought back any stock, I dont know but i hope its because they will offer to buy back directly from the 15% shareholder who has started to sell shares already.
I dont know why they didnt sell more bromine it needs furthur research. an optimistic possible explanation might be that they are retaining more of their production in house for added value products like chemicals and waste-water treatment and we will see those numbers in q1 of 2011.



To: Spekulatius who wrote (41812)3/18/2011 8:26:28 AM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 78974
 
GFRE_after reading the accountants letters in the 10k report carefully, i surmise that they have expressed an unqualified opinion as to the 12/31/10 balance sheet and income statements. so Im convinced the cash is there for sure. To me the first letter implies that there may have been some issues of timing of recognition of revenues and expenses relating to the quarterlies.