Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (604755)	3/22/2011 10:03:52 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575637

I say at the top a friend of mine just posted it!!

To: steve harris who wrote (604755)	3/22/2011 10:17:27 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575637

It its reasonably likely that unlike Chernobyl not a single death will be conclusively linked to this nuclear incident, which wouldn't mean it didn't kill anyone (although that's possible too), only that if it does the actual death will come after a long time and be hard to pin to this incident. Its essentially certain that the earthquake/tsunami related deaths that are not nuclear related with be much larger than the early deaths from radiation release. Its also pretty certain that this incident will harm the prospects of nuclear power going forward (in a way that I feel isn't really deserved) Edit - I accidentally posted that in reply to the wrong post, it was supposed to be a reply to Message 27257085

To: steve harris who wrote (604755)	3/23/2011 6:58:28 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575637

Yeah, but he was really really stoned at the time so he doesn't remember.

To: steve harris who wrote (604755)	3/23/2011 8:41:45 AM
From: koan	Respond to of 1575637

I posted an article someone else wrote and it was presented as though I wrote it; and then when I point out I did not write it, you accuse me of playing games. Boy is that twisted logic. The person saying I posted something I did not post, they were the one playing games. PS and someone might argue having radiation levels in Tokyo's water system (30 million people) so high enfants cannot drink it, might be considered worse than chernobyl! <<And I do not believe I posted the above You did post it. Message 27243434 At its best, this radiation might be limited to north Japan, where it could be watered down and then fade into being a nuclear wrecking ground like Chernobyl.>>