Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (72308)	3/24/2011 3:08:46 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217764

Well Jacob, I haven't gone into it as precisely as you have done, but that is certainly a possible outcome given the enthusiasm democratic countries show for Big Brotherdom and Big Brother's continuing inroads against personal liberty, property, and self-determination. Already there has been New Zealand government led public discussion about the ethics and "who decides" of genetic selection adsa.org.nz I took part in those discussions and the tendency was very much for Big Brother to take a big part. 15 years ago I was discussing Big Brother with Lindsay Perigo an Ayn Randist Libertarian. He thought Nanny government would go from anti-smoking to anti-fat. I told him that seemed ridiculous but now I have to say he was spot on. The government is now hot on the trail and has been for years. There isn't much banned and taxed yet, but they are working on it. Dietary supplements are already banned, licensed, permitted etc. Halibut liver oil is apparently a banned substance for goodness sakes. It would not at all be surprising for licensed parenting to be compulsory. Judging by all other government efforts, their eugenics programmes will be a disaster. Imagine legions of perfect bureaucratic kleptocrats. Mqurice

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (72308)	3/24/2011 10:57:02 AM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 217764

Jacob says "Similarly, the future will be more bizarre than we can imagine" Which must mean he she or it; believes in the random function? If so why would he, she or it, engage in so much projective identification? as is the case here; "ZPG is the only LT viable solution, and this isn't going to happen without a Plan." The contradictions creeping through encroach on attempts to be loved and respected. Jacob believes in central planning, pogroms, and projective identification, as in mouthpiece ego centric shaping of outcomes. Jacob is not quantum.