Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (47150)	3/25/2011 4:23:53 PM
From: John	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

I'm still surprised at the way Juan "Amnesty" McShame was nominated and then seemed to tank the election on purpose. Recall that he was largely written off early on in the Republican primaries.

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (47150)	3/25/2011 4:27:23 PM
From: Cage Rattler	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

No that's not what I'm saying. Certainly the best-electable candidate should be the standard bearer. However, there is serious disagreement on the elect-ability of some very fine candidates. What is the point in running the finest candidate on earth, if they are totally unelectable? Palin, is IMHO unelectable. IMHO she is seriously flawed by her inability to think quickly on her feet -- and you CAN NOT LEARN HOW TO DO THAT, you are born with it "like a mother Grizzly." :0) When the press continuously and unjustly attacks a person like Palin over a protracted period, the press is drawing on a finite credibility account. Sarah is doing a magnificent job in baiting the media and thus depleting their balance. We're on the same team and I'm sure Sarah Palin understands just what she's doing and why. We can get a good and electable ticket up and running but now is not the time -- it's too early in the game.