SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (605613)3/29/2011 5:54:42 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583630
 
Preventing a slaughter doesn't have to be in national interest...... But the right howled about Saddam "killing his own people" a decade or more after it happened...and then invaded the country...

This is just about the most morally bankrupt argument I can imagine.

That somehow, we ought to overlook Saddam's massacres of some 800,000 to 1,000,000 people over a period of years, solely because it is convenient to do so. Never mind that we also had legitimate national security interests in removing him that were an order of magnitude greater than the interest in removing Q.

According to The New York Times, "he [Saddam] murdered as many as a million of his people, many with poison gas. He tortured, maimed and imprisoned countless more. His unprovoked invasion of Iran is estimated to have left another million people dead. His seizure of Kuwait threw the Middle East into crisis. More insidious, arguably, was the psychological damage he inflicted on his own land. Hussein created a nation of informants — friends on friends, circles within circles — making an entire population complicit in his rule".[8] Others have estimated 800,000 deaths caused by Saddam not counting the Iran-Iraq war.[9] Estimates as to the number of Iraqis executed by Saddam's regime vary from 300-500,000[10] to over 600,000,[11] estimates as to the number of Kurds he massacred vary from 70,000 to 300,000,[12] and estimates as to the number killed in the put-down of the 1991 rebellion vary from 60,000[13] to 200,000.[11] Estimates for the number of dead in the Iran-Iraq war range upwards from 300,000.[14]



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (605613)3/29/2011 6:38:40 PM
From: Taro2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583630
 
Not intervening in Rwanda was Clinton's biggest shame, but for you it was his sex life.

No. But for us on the right side, his lying thus committing perjury and in doing so still as the President of the USA, that was his biggest shame.

The subject of his lying was of minor importance.
But will you guys of lower intellectual capability ever grasp that?
I doubt it.

You guys have sex on your brains, just like other low ball lives and most primitive monkeys.

/Taro



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (605613)3/29/2011 7:17:03 PM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583630
 
If its not in our national interest, then Obambi has no call to put our servicemembers in harm's way, doofus.

Clinton's shame was the violation of his oath of office and committing perjury while sitting as President...the sex life was the fixation of you libtards....

The national interest in Iraq was clear...in Libya, there is none. And the moron in the WH as usual is WAAAAY over his head.