Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Hurst who wrote (606001)	3/31/2011 9:03:08 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1583671

Glad to hear it. Obama's steely resolve must have them scared.

To: Don Hurst who wrote (606001)	3/31/2011 9:09:04 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583671

Woman charged with email threats About time. e-mail print By Bill Glauber of the Journal Sentinel March 31, 2011 5:04 p.m. \|(139) Comments Madison - A 26-year-old woman was charged Thursday with two felony counts and two misdemeanor counts for allegedly making email threats against Wisconsin lawmakers during the height of the battle over Gov. Scott Walker's budget-repair bill. Katherine R. Windels of Cross Plains was named in a criminal complaint filed in Dane County Criminal Court. According to the criminal complaint, Windels allegedly sent an email threat to State Sen. Robert Cowles (R-Green Bay) March 9. Later that evening, she allegedly sent another email to 15 Republican legislators, including Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau). The subject line of the second email was: "Atten: Death Threat!!!! Bomb!!!" In that email, she purportedly wrote, "Please put your things in order because you will be killed and your families will also be killed due to your actions in the last 8 weeks." "I hope you have a good time in hell," she allegedly wrote in the lengthy email in which she purportedly listed scenarios in which the legislators and their families would die, including bombings and by "putting a nice little bullet in your head." According to the criminal complaint, Windels told investigators “I sent out emails that I was disgusted and very upset by what they were doing.” Asked if she intended to follow through on any of her threats, Windels told the investigators "No," according to the complaint. Windels was charged with two felony counts "bomb scare" and two misdemeanor counts of "computer message-threatening injury/bodily harm." If convicted, each felony count carries a maximum penalty of three years and six months in prison and a $10,000 fine, and each misdemeanor count carries a maximum penalty of 90 days in prison and a $1,000 fine. jsonline.com

To: Don Hurst who wrote (606001)	3/31/2011 9:11:53 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1583671

Kucinich: “Obama Has Launched a War That’s a Clear and Arrogant Violation of the Constitution” Don't these antiwar anti-Obama lefties rub you the wrong way? “This is a clear and arrogant violation of our Constitution. This is war. Even a war launched for humanitarian reasons is still a war. And — only Congress can declare war” weaselzippers.us

To: Don Hurst who wrote (606001)	3/31/2011 9:23:30 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Respond to of 1583671

Great!!

To: Don Hurst who wrote (606001)	4/1/2011 12:52:31 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 1583671

Funny to watch liberals support a war of choice over oil (Europe's, not ours) after spending years screaming about Bush and "Neos". BTW you are now a Neocon. Obama sent us to war to prevent a massacre? After saying preventing genocide in Iraq wouldn't have been enough to justify the surge (that he'd opposed but which succeeded)? No, it doesn't have anything to do with massacres. The worst thing about this is the Obama adm hasn't given any thought to what they're doing. They respond to headlines and change policies daily: We delayed the attacks till Obama could arrange a foreign trip while Daffy nearly recovered control of the entire country. Then they said we were enforcing a no-fly zone. Reports of ground attacks and civilian casulties hit the news so we've now stopped attacking Daffy's ground forces .... though European planes may keep doing so. So the rebel advance has now turned around and the rebels are in retreat again. On successive days, the administration has said they will arm the rebels or they won't arm the rebels. They said we'll have no boots on the ground, then it came out Obama signed an order to send in CIA/SF spotters to direct air attacks. Will they be pulled out now or will Obama order them to wear sneakers? And what about that Marine expeditionary force on the way from Camp Lejeune? Yesterday, the administration said they may bomb the rebels if they massacre people loyal to Daffy. Steely resolve? Thoughtful? Not!! They bumbling around. Doing one thing, then reversing themselves when the news gets out. Personally, whatever it is the inempt Obama administration resolves (ha ha) to do, I want America to be successful at it. I think we need to get rid of Daffy now, since Obama's intervention has made him a dangerous enemy again. Get rid of Daffy before he has more of our airliners blown up.