SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cloud, edge and decentralized computing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (617)4/1/2011 8:41:55 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1685
 
The Rackspace takeover rumors will not die:

Rackspace Insists It Will Stay Independent Amid Takeover Talk

By Steven Russolillo
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
APRIL 1, 2011, 11:13 A.M. ET

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Rackspace Hosting Inc. (RAX) Chief Executive Lanham Napier insists his company is focused on remaining a stand-alone player even as deal chatter within the data-storage sector intensifies.

Rackspace, a data-center operator in the hosting and so-called cloud computing industry, has seen its share price soar 45% since January amid strong revenue growth and continued takeover speculation. The stock, which has nearly tripled in price from a year ago, hit a fresh all-time high Friday as Wall Street continues to bet Rackspace is an attractive candidate to be acquired.

But Napier maintained he is focused on keeping Rackspace independent and will continue to explore partnerships and small acquisitions.

"I think the merger-and-acquisition speculation is a massive distraction," Napier said in an interview with Dow Jones Newswires. "We love our business, and we are an organic-growth company. We're looking at start ups that share our values and believe in our mission of being a leader in service cloud computing."

Rackspace, Dell Inc. (DELL) and Equinix Inc. (EQIX) said earlier this week that they have collaborated to develop an open-source cloud-computing platform--dubbed OpenStack--which is aimed to compete against Amazon Inc.'s (AMZN) Web Services. Rackspace late last year said it acquired Cloudkick, a web-application provider that helps to manage servers. Napier said these are examples of the strategic roadmap Rackspace wants to keep pursing in the future.

The takeover chatter surrounding Rackspace, Savvis Inc. (SVVS) and other cloud-service providers follows Verizon Communications Inc.'s (VZ) recent announcement to acquire Terremark Worldwide Inc. (TMRK) in a $1.4 billion deal and Time Warner Cable Inc.'s (TWC) deal to take over NaviSite Inc. (NAVI) for about $230 million. Both deals earlier this year highlight the attractiveness of up-and-coming cloud-services providers to larger and more established companies.

Businesses are showing a greater interest in cloud computing, which enables more cost-efficient access to computer servers and data storage over the Internet and internal networks. Data tracker In-Stat LLC has said U.S. spending on cloud computing and managed hosting should surpass $13 billion in 2014, up from less than $3 billion in 2010.

"The cloud-computing category is white hot," Napier said. "And now you have tech incumbents with cash that are trying to buy their way in."

Business spending is starting to pick up again coming out of the recession. Companies are slowly becoming more comfortable investing in technology now that sales and profits have not only stabilized but are expanding.

"If I was to say a year ago I was cautiously optimistic about business spending, then this year in general I'd say the caution is down and the optimism is up," Napier said. "But do not infer things are ripping, and we're back off to the bucking-bronco days because we're not."

Rackspace last month reported better-than-anticipated fourth-quarter revenue, due in large part to increased demand for its hosting services. For 2011, Rackspace said it expects revenue growth to exceed the 24% growth rate achieved last year.

But analysts have questioned the capital-intensive nature of Rackspace's business model, especially because the company's capital-expenditure guidance will likely be higher than its revenue trajectory for 2011.

"Our business will always be relatively capital intensive," he said, largely because the company regularly has to upgrade its infrastructure. "The magic is in the margin of service layer we add on top of that infrastructure. We're making investments to continue to make the business more capital efficient, but we have more work to do on it."

Napier's insistence on keeping Rackspace independent contrasts with recent remarks from competitor Savvis CEO Jim Ousley. He has acknowledged that he has had more strategic discussions than usual with bankers and inquiring partners. But Napier said he remains focused on growing his company as a stand-alone player.

"I absolutely have a fiduciary obligation, and I work for the stockholders," he said. "But we're trying to build something great, and greatness isn't achieved overnight. We're just getting going. When I think about the market opportunity to build the service leader in cloud computing, I think little old Rackspace will win that one."

-By Steven Russolillo, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-2180; steven.russolillo@dowjones.com

tinyurl.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (617)4/4/2011 9:30:28 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1685
 
A smart move by EMC and VMW:

VMware Takes Over Mozy Cloud Storage from EMC

Mozy and VMware are a better product-making match for each other on a daily basis than Mozy and business owner EMC.

By: Chris Preimesberger
eWeek.com
2011-04-04

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Mozy, which has served as the cloud-storage division of EMC for the last four years, revealed to eWEEK on April 4 that its business relationship has changed with the parent company.

Starting immediately, employees at the Utah-based Mozy will be seeing a new employer name on their paychecks: that of its cousin, VMware, also owned by EMC.

The main reason for this business-side change is that Mozy, with its cloud-based services, and Palo Alto, Calif.-based VMware, which is moving more of its own emphasis into cloud-building software, are a better product-making match for each other on a daily basis than Mozy and business owner EMC, spokesmen for both companies told eWEEK.

EMC, based in Hopkinton, Mass., is the world's largest independent storage hardware and software maker. The company is run as a very tight ship by CEO Joe Tucci and his lieutenants.

Mozy and VMware, more laid-back West Coast-oriented companies, are much closer in corporate culture than with EMC, an established East Coast corporation that is rapidly becoming a full-service data center systems provider.

Backstory of VMware and EMC Relationship

VMware and EMC have had a difficult relationship since the Palo Alto, Calif., company was acquired in January 2004 for $625 million. The business-approach problems came to a head in July 2008, when EMC relieved CEO Diane Greene of her duties and replaced her with current CEO Paul Maritz.

Shortly thereafter, Greene's husband, VMware's chief scientist, Mendel Rosenblum, left the company. Both Greene and Rosenblum had been among the founders of the company, which is now by far the world's largest virtualization software maker—and a reliable cash cow for EMC.

Mozy Chief Marketing Officer and Vice President of Product Management Russ Stockdale noted that this behind-the-scenes change would not affect Mozy customers in any way. All service-level agreements remain the same, he said.

EMC still owns both companies, so that has not changed. Stockdale said that more and more Mozy and VMware employees have been working together in project groups and that it made more sense for the two companies to create a closer relationship going forward.

eweek.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (617)4/10/2011 1:41:36 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1685
 
Dell makes a major commitment to cloud computing:

Dude, You’re Getting A Cloud: Dell’s Major Change

By CHRIS BARTH
Forbes
Apr. 8 2011 - 11:30 am

Yesterday, Dell Inc. announced that it will spend $1 billion this fiscal year, in an effort to build out its Cloud computing capabilities. The planned expenditure will be focused on the creation of a number of next generation Cloud data centers, designed to enable both storage and virtualization. Additionally, Dell will open 22 “Global Solutions Centers” in the next 18 months, where customers can learn about Cloud computing and troubleshoot any issues they might encounter.

Dell is the latest in a string of large tech-oriented companies to announce a commitment to Cloud computing and associated development, as tech giants move to embrace the next wave of computing. Amazon recently announced Amazon Cloud Drive and Amazon Cloud Player, an online media locker that allows users to store and stream media in the Cloud. Google, another tech behemoth, has built its core business largely on Cloud computing. Dell’s main competitor, Hewlett-Packard, announced a commitment to Cloud development last month.

Tech guru George Gilder sees Cloud computing as the next frontier in technology, and a logical extension of Bell’s law. Bell’s law, named after Gordon Bell, states that every ten years, computing capabilities will improve 100-fold.

“This enables and requires a fundamental change in computer architectures,” Gilder told Steve Forbes. “And we’re seeing it today in the rise of cloud computing.”

Gilder also referenced a quote by Google chairman (and former CEO) Eric Schmidt when talking about the Cloud:

“When the back plane of your computer runs more slowly than the network, the computer hollows out and distributes itself across the network. And that’s essentially what is underway today, where the actual computing is almost never done or rarely done in the device that you have in your hand or on your desk.”

Gilder’s assertion that computing will make its next strides in the Cloud rather than on the desktop informs Dell’s decision to spend big on data centers rather than on PCs, which have traditionally been a pillar of their business. It’s a drastic shift for the 26-year-old company, and one that has some wondering if Dell can stay on track given the change in direction.

Last week I spoke with David Eiswert, manager of T.Rowe Price’s Global Technology Fund, and he talked about the challenges to established tech companies and the move away from PCs.

“We’re in a period of disruption like we haven’t seen in twenty years, and really that comes down to what’s happening in clouds and the virtualization of the data center,” said Eiswert. “What’s happening is that disruptions change the business model and change how you monetize. And that’s putting tremendous pressure on mature tech. So these big cap companies trading at low multiples, whether it’s Dell or Intel or Microsoft or Cisco, these companies are facing this time where there’s a tremendous disruption.”

Eiswert used Intel as an example of the paradigm shift – an example that can easily be applied to Dell’s recent announcement.

“Intel is virtually doubling their capital expenditure this year. And they’re not doing that because PCs are flying off the shelves,” said Eiswert.

“Someone told me, ‘PCs are weak, Intel will probably cut its cap ex.’ That person doesn’t understand the problem. Intel needs to accelerate their cap ex because it needs to compete on these new factors – it’s power consumption, it’s form factor, it’s integration. These are all things that did not define Intel’s monopoly in the PC.”

Dell’s move into the cloud – and the large capital expenditure that comes along with it – is likely an acknowledgement that PCs are no longer the core business that they once were, and that customers are increasingly seeking mobile and Cloud-based computing options.

“2011 will be the first year that we ship more tablets and smartphones than we do PCs,” said Eiswert. “Do you think that’s going to reverse? No way it’s going to reverse.”

As Dell kicks its Cloud expansion into overdrive, it’s likely just hoping it’s not too late to the game.

tinyurl.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (617)4/12/2011 9:28:20 PM
From: Glenn Petersen2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1685
 
VMware Launches Open-Source Cloud

By Stacey Higginbotham
Gigaom
Apr. 12, 2011, 9:05am PT

VMware has entered the cloud game by offering an open-source package called Cloud Foundry, a Platform-as-a-Service that should strike fear in the hearts of its competitors, especially the likes of Salesforce.com, Microsoft and Rackspace. The platform will offer developers the tools to build out applications on public clouds, private clouds and anyplace else, whether the underlying server runs VMware or not. Like last week’s Open Compute Project from Facebook or Rackspace’s OpenStack effort, Cloud Foundry is a pretty big deal.

So What Exactly Is Cloud Foundry?

The goal of Cloud Foundry is to hide complexity from developers and make it easy to deploy and run applications anywhere. This is the same marketing speak that folks toting the cloud have pitched for years, but VMware wants to make it even more simple. Instead of worrying about instances or how to support a database, you just write a few lines of code, and Cloud Foundry makes it all happen for you. From day one, the platform will support Java thanks to VMware’s SpringSource buy back in 2009, Sinatra, Rails and node.js. However those wanting more frameworks and languages can build them, since the product is open-source.

Roger Bodamer, EVP Products and Technology at 10Gen – which supports the MongoDB NoSQL database — says it took about three months to integrate MongoDB with Cloud Foundry. 10gen is one of several launch partners that include RightScale, Joyent and Pivotal Labs.



VMware’s service has three components, illustrated by the nifty little slide above. The platform (what is called the “cloud provider interface”) can be a public cloud, such as Amazon’s EC2; a private cloud running VMware or other software; the actual Cloud Foundry platform; or what VMware calls a downloadable microcloud, which is basically a developer sandbox that looks like the Cloud Foundry platform running on a server or computer and synchs back up to any of the clouds.

The application services are items such as the existing MongoDB service already built-in, RabbitMQ messaging services, Redis, MySQL and Postgres for data, and others to come as programmers want to build it out. The shift toward open source is significant, because it runs somewhat counter to VMware’s roots, but it also shows how influential the open source world is on the cloud.

Charles Fitzgerald, a platform strategist for VMware, said in a conversation with me last Thursday, ”Open source is the price of entry in the cloud world today.” So VMware will offer Cloud Foundry as a paid, supported product for customers as well as provide the underlying code so developers can build their own. The product will open for an invite-only beta in stages, with the commercial support beta coming in the second half of this year.

Who Gets Hurt

Charles Fitzgerald says Cloud Foundry will sit on top of platform plays such as OpenStack, but in truth, it’s likely to hurt that effort by obviating the need for enterprises and other developers to worry about the underlying infrastructure platform. For those who want to build out an app, electing to deploy using Cloud Foundry means the developer can choose where to host an app without ever caring if it’s using OpenStack.

Fitzgerald claims the big victim with this move will be middleware providers such as IBM, which have multi-billion businesses helping connect information in huge enterprises. While he’s aware the licensing revenue for open-source software can be a tenth of the original value of the software, he says, “It’s new revenue to us and old revenue to them, and a billion looks pretty good to us.”

However the most immediate victims may well be the existing PaaS players such as Salesforce.com, Google and a strong of startups that have been building out products in this space around specific languages. Salesforce, which works with VMware in a joint PaaS called VMforce, suddenly has some serious competition that can interoperate with apps on the Salesforce.com platform as well as any others. VMforce will still exist, but now it looks like a walled garden.

And the smaller players, such as PHP Fog; Red Hat (srht), which purchased Makara; and EngineYard, all suddenly have a multi-billion competitor that has the potential to be all clouds to all comers. Even configuration management as a service startups might see some business erode as apps hosted in a PaaS have less need for those services.

VMware’s Constant Search for Reinvention

Fitzgerald talked a lot about openness and eliminating the hurdles for developers, but this move is yet another continuation of VMware’s willingness to throw its businesses under the bus as the world of cloud computing evolves. VMware recognizes that openness is the key for delivering cloud services and that interoperability will matter to more and more companies, especially those forming today.

While the PaaS market isn’t huge at the moment, it’s clearly an area of interest with Amazon adding Elastic Beanstalk — its own PaaS product — as well as Salesforce.com talking up its Heroku buy and PaaS capabilities. Fitzgerald acknowledged that it’s early days, but says, “It’s very early and part of that is the limitations of the solutions and that are out there, so we can really make it mainsteam and legitimize it.” Flexibility is the biggest selling factor behind the cloud and with this offering that’s what VMware wants to offer. It’s pretty compelling.

tinyurl.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (617)4/15/2011 5:31:09 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1685
 
The Business Market Plays Cloud Computing Catch-Up

By STEVE LOHR
New York Times
April 14, 2011

The big spenders on technology are businesses and government agencies. They buy about 75 percent of the computing goods and services sold worldwide. Yet it is increasingly evident they are not driving the new ideas, excitement and powerhouse technology companies in ascent these days.

“The cutting edge of innovation is on the consumer side — digital technologies for consumption activity, play, entertainment and social-networked communication — and not in corporations anymore,” observed Timothy F. Bresnahan, an economist at Stanford.

Nowhere is that more apparent than in cloud computing, the technology industry’s buzz term for customers’ accessing information held in big data centers remotely over the Internet from anywhere, as if the services were in a cloud.

In the early days of computers, technology advanced because of government-financed research projects and work in corporate laboratories. Hobbyists developed the first personal computers, but it was only when I.B.M. entered the field in 1981, lending its seal of approval, that the PC industry really took off. Selling to businesses paved the way for the leading PC software and chip suppliers, Microsoft and Intel, to become giant corporations.

But marquee companies of the Internet era have made their names and fortunes mainly in the consumer market — both the first-generation Web winners like Amazon and Google, and the second-generation successes like Facebook and Twitter. And they have grown big and grown fast by offering search, shopping and social-networking services in the cloud.

Cloud computing, though, is more than a hyper-efficient means of distributing digital services. The cloud model is animated by a set of Internet technologies for juggling computing workloads in data centers far more efficiently than in the past — potentially reducing costs by about half, analysts say.

Yet to date, the large, established technology companies — and their businesses and government customers — have trailed in cloud computing. The marketing of the cloud, analysts say, is way ahead of real offerings by suppliers and its adoption by business customers.

But there are some recent signs of change. Last week, I.B.M. introduced a range of cloud services, including paying for computing resources like processing and storage on a metered pay-for-use formula, almost as if modeled on an electric utility. I.B.M. will offer customers an à la carte menu, in which they pay for different levels of guaranteed security, support and availability.

I.B.M., a bellwether in the corporate technology market, forecasts that it will have $7 billion in cloud revenue by 2015. Of the total, $4 billion will be customers shifting to cloud delivery from the company’s traditional software and services, and $3 billion is expected to be entirely new business.

“We’re moving to where the puck is going in this industry,” said Steven A. Mills, I.B.M.’s senior vice president for software and hardware. “And we’re more than willing to make this transition.”

In another industry move announced last week, Dell said that it would invest $1 billion over the next two years to build 10 new data centers and expand customer support, largely for cloud offerings.

The largest single customer for computing goods and services, the United States government, endorsed the cloud model this year. Vivek Kundra, the White House chief information officer, wrote a “Federal Cloud Computing Strategy” report, and identified $20 billion, or one quarter of the government’s total spending on information technology, as “a potential target” for migration to the cloud.

That document has certainly caught the attention of the government’s technology suppliers, like Lockheed Martin, the largest. “We’re keenly focused on cloud computing,” said Melvin Greer, a senior fellow at Lockheed Martin.

Still, the outlook is for an evolutionary shift toward the new technology spanning several years, even a decade or more, analysts say. People set the pace of technology adoption, and corporate data centers are filled with people whose skills and livelihoods are based on older technology and ways of doing things.

But technology managers, surveys show, are also genuinely concerned about security, reliability and liability if confidential corporate data resides on another company’s computers — and getting locked into proprietary clouds, controlled by one company. Standards groups are moving to set technical rules for sharing data across different clouds, including a working group established last week by the IEEE, a professional electronic and computer engineering organization.

“Cloud computing will become the new foundation for corporate information technology — it’s inevitable,” said Frank Gens, chief analyst for IDC, a technology research firm. “But there are a lot of concerns, challenges and inertia that will slow things down.”

There are also insurgents, like Amazon, that could speed things up in corporate cloud computing. Five years ago, the online bookseller and retailer decided to start a side business, offering computing resources to businesses from its network of sophisticated data centers. It called the new unit Amazon Web Services. It is a pay-for-use utility model, with customers paying from pennies to millions of dollars a month, says Adam Selipsky, vice president for product management.

Today, the customer ranks include Netflix, NASA, drug companies and major banks, which use Amazon’s data centers to remotely run Web applications that do tasks like tracking customer movie requests or running credit-risk simulations.

The Amazon cloud strategy, Mr. Selipsky says, mirrors its tactics in online retailing: build scale and efficiency, then cut costs and prices to gain market share. Amazon Web Services, he said, has reduced prices a dozen times in the last three years. “Most of that has been in the absence of competition,” Mr. Selipsky said, “because competitors have been so slow to emerge.”

Yet competition in the cloud market is intensifying. And that competition is taking shape across a number of fronts. It includes vendors offering basic computing resources like Amazon and Rackspace, joined by telecommunications giants like AT&T and Verizon that have entered the cloud business; companies offering ready-to-use applications tailored for businesses like Google’s online e-mail, document and collaboration services; Microsoft’s online version of its Office and collaboration tools; and Salesforce.com’s online customer management and collaboration tools.

Several companies also have built development environments on which programmers can build cloud software applications. Google has App Engine, Amazon has BeanStalk, Microsoft has Azure, Salesforce.com has Force.com, and VMware has Cloud Foundry, which was introduced on Tuesday. By 2014, IDC estimates that 30 percent of total spending on software applications in the corporate market will be for cloud applications.

Revenue from business cloud services — infrastructure resources, software applications and developer tools — was $22.2 billion last year, less than 2 percent of total technology spending, IDC estimates. But cloud revenue is growing at more than 25 percent a year, and will reach $55.5 billion by 2014, the research firm estimates.

Salesforce.com, founded in 1999, began selling customer-relationship software to businesses as an Internet service long before the industry began talking of cloud computing. Things built slowly at first, but Marc Benioff, founder and chief executive of Salesforce.com, says the turning point has come.

“What’s being called the cloud now is the future of enterprise software, but when I started in 1999 no one believed that,” said Mr. Benioff, who recently raised the company’s revenue forecast by 25 percent. “Sometimes you do have to wait them out.”

tinyurl.com