Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (606262)	4/2/2011 6:36:10 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579807

Who is Obama supporting .... NATO just bombed the rebels. Message 27281631

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (606262)	4/2/2011 6:43:26 PM
From: steve harris	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579807

Obama has already demonstrated he's a two faced liar; he's taken both sides in Egypt and Libya. Would you like to read the transcripts of Obama's speeches where he contradicted himself?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (606262)	4/3/2011 4:59:01 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579807

Time admits that Obama and advisors are lying about exaggerating the need to attack Libya March 25, 2011 · 8 comments Time Magazine just ran a story titled “Why the U.S. Went to War: Inside the White House Debate on Libya.” It’s remarkable only in that the unabashedly liberal magazine admits that President Obama and his minions “exaggerated” a detail or two in order to bolster their case for going into Libya: President Obama in Rio, praying that no one notices his Libyan "exaggerations" President Barack Obama says he’s intervening to prevent atrocities in Libya. But details of behind-the-scenes debates at the White House show he’s going to war in part to rehabilitate an idea … the president and some of his advisers are so eager to rehabilitate the idea of preventive intervention that they’re exaggerating the violence they say they are intervening to prevent in Libya. “The effort to shoe-horn this into an imminent genocide model is strained,” says one senior administration official. That’s dangerous. Americans deserve an honest explanation when their leaders take them to war. Obama and his aides know they are taking a big risk. “It’s a huge gamble,” says the senior administration official. The administration knows, for example, that al Qaeda, which has active cells in Libya, will try to exploit the power vacuum that will come with a weak or ousted Gaddafi. Bush lied and people died, but Obama exaggerated and people were exterminated. Probably too long for a bumper sticker, huh ihatethemedia.com