SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skinowski who wrote (419697)4/3/2011 10:12:57 AM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
You make good points. I think we would have been totally unconcerned about Libya if the place did not fall into chaos.

Further to your point - by prolonging the war the damage to infrastructure would seem to increase.

I am open to your interpretation.

An alternate interpretation could be that intervention would have quickly ended the problem and most quickly restored oil flow.

Bob



To: skinowski who wrote (419697)4/3/2011 11:20:10 AM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793917
 
Yes, but still if it would be all about oil the logical thing would be to help Qaddafi.

Could you support this country actually helping him suppress the revolution? Yikes. What would this say to the rest of the world?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News