Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (419714)	4/3/2011 11:57:11 AM
From: skinowski	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793895

We can only do what we can do and then let the chips fall where they may. All of these questions you raise only lead to inaction When it comes to picking wars, inaction is better than clueless action. It appears that we are fighting against a bad guy on behalf of our sworn enemies. It appears that the jihadi movement is a global phenomenon and that there is an international army of jihad. The same guys who beat up the Russians in Afghanistan will travel to Kosovo, and then to the West Bank, then to Iraq, and then back to Afghanistan. It appears that they are serious professional fighters, and are loosely but fairly well organized. If we are fighting now on their side, that would be pretty idiotic. Yeah, inaction would have been preferable, to say the least