SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (72726)4/4/2011 1:03:44 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217588
 
ElM, it's okay to depend on patented technology: <The Chinese do not want to be vulnerable to technical embargoes by depending on foreign patents. > If push comes to shove, China can just ignore all foreign patents and do what they like. It's only actual exports that the USA can limit, not what people in China do themselves. They can copy any idea they like if they are willing to breach World Trade Organisation rules and have their exports stopped and assets confiscated.

China didn't invent TD-SCDMA any more than L M Ericsson, Nokia and the GSM Cartel of slimeball hagfish invented W-CDMA. That's like getting a Lexus, swapping a couple of headlights, a steering wheel, the horn, tyres and towbar and calling it your own personally designed car. The "inventions" of TD-SCDMA and W-CDMA were to try to reduce royalties and to ring-fence some markets with political power.

Because the GSM gang got away with it, people around the world, such as our estimable TJ, pay 12% royalties to buy a W-CDMA based device instead of the measly 5% [at most] royalties to buy a CDMA2000 based device.

TD-SCDMA won't be used outside China [other than maybe in a few countries in submissive relationships with China]. Europe's political clout and outright banning of CDMA2000 got W-CDMA into a position of dominance. But now LTE is coming. Again, the GSM Guild contrived to leverage their previous rip-off of the public into the new technology. Qualcomm continues to assert their regular measly royalty requirements.

That Cocom business was a physical matter of export controls: <CoCom ceased to function on March 31, 1994, and the then-current control list of embargoed goods was retained by the member nations until the successor, the Wassenaar Arrangement, was established.> It wasn't a matter of patent control. Anyone can ignore patents, and they often do. That's why there is so much litigation in patent law. It's only when disputed objects show up at a border that control can be exerted.

Yes, if you have DIY oil production, foreign countries can't ban exports of goods and services to Brazil, but that's a different matter to patents.

Mqurice