Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (420373)	4/6/2011 2:42:16 PM
From: Geoff Altman	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793905

When the left goes to war claiming humanitarian reasons, it's because of humanitarian reasons..... When the right goes to war for humanitarian reasons, it's because of oil or imperialism..... It's amazing how a change in administrations can change the narrative......

To: Katelew who wrote (420373)	4/6/2011 2:46:35 PM
From: unclewest	15 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793905

Obama fired another round from his Bullsxxt gun. "Just yesterday Mr. Obama said, "If they can't sort out their differences, I want them back here tomorrow. We'll meet everyday until we resolve the Budget Issue. I'll have my whole team here!" Yet today, he doesn't have time for a meeting as he heads out on the Election Trail, and oh yes, let's not forget the big party he's attending for the tax-evading NY Democrat Rep. Charles Rangel [D-NY15]. You all have to admit that his re-election run and heaping praise on a convicted tax-evader is much more important that resolving our ongoing Budget Crisis and perhaps the shut-down of the US Government! This worthless POS has to go!"

To: Katelew who wrote (420373)	4/6/2011 2:56:05 PM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Respond to of 793905

preventing the killing of the rebels. al Qaeda?

To: Katelew who wrote (420373)	4/6/2011 8:07:13 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793905

Obama said this on March 29th. Will you explain to me what he meant, because I can't find an explanation anywhere. What "interests?" "While I will never minimise the costs involved in military action, I am convinced that a failure to act in Libya would have carried a far greater price for America," Obama said in his address to the nation. "For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security and advocate for human freedom. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world's many challenges. But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. That is what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks." zeenews.com