Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (51709)	4/7/2011 1:32:00 AM
From: richardred	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95572

Jacob: I agree on much of what your saying about big mergers and good corporate strategy. Especially in high tech, but IMO they still will continue as they have over the years. As an Investor. I just try to pick their targets of various sizes. We have global players now who want in the US market. IMO down the road we will be talking more about Chinese companies buying US companies, or their divisions. I Just keep watching companies like the General Electric's , HP's, Procter & Gambles , BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY'S, Nestles, & 3M's Ect. Ect.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (51709)	4/7/2011 8:08:25 AM
From: cluka	Respond to of 95572

Paying 70-80% premium when you could be paying 30-40% premium for a purchase is strange. It's against basic laws of economics unless there are some perverse incentives that skew the natural order of things. That is exactly what is so strange about this whole economic situation. We are not operating in a free market economy. There are all sort of fiscal machinations that are skewing the economic reasoning. Be it negative interest rates or tax policies it is hard to get a clear picture from outside what the valuations are. I am sure TI is getting a benefit of some sort from overpaying. At the end of the day they are trying to acquire as cheap as they can.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (51709)	4/22/2011 2:34:14 AM
From: richardred	Respond to of 95572

I hated the McAfee acquisition for Intel from day one. Cudos to McAfee holders though. The only thing I figured that made sense is that they could bundle their chips sales to PC manufacturer customers along with security software. IMO Microsoft would have made more sense except for the fact that most software competitors would have cried foul to the FTC. DEALTALK-Intel mobile strategy hinges on M&A Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:18pm EDT * Intel's strategic direction uncertain * McAfee deal still not proven to offer synergies * Another wireless deal could help (For more Reuters DEALTALKs, click [DEALTALK/]). By Nadia Damouni and Noel Randewich NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO, April 21 (Reuters) - A strong start to the year has bought top chip maker Intel Corp some time to find a place in the rapidly changing smartphone and tablet computer markets, but it will have to move quickly. Intel's (INTC.O) quarterly results have reduced concerns PC sales are being eaten up by Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) iPad, but some recent deals have left many analysts and bankers puzzled over the company's direction. With the growth of mobile device sales, Intel will have to prove over the next few quarters that it will not miss a hard-won opportunity to compete in these markets, several said. "Intel has to do something because the way the world is working, especially where the tablets are going, these guys need to have a mobile phone solution that allows them to process like everyone else does," said one banker. In mobile, Intel has fallen far behind Britain's ARM Holdings Plc (ARM.L), whose chips are much more power efficient -- a key advantage in devices that run on batteries. Intel's mobile processors are based on the company's decades-old "x86" PC chip architecture, but says its advanced manufacturing technology -- letting it squeeze more circuits onto a chip -- will help it prevail in the mobile market. But some analysts warn that Intel might have fallen too far behind to catch up and one recently advocated acquiring a player that uses ARM technology. Nomura analyst Romit Shah wrote an open letter to CEO Paul Otellini ahead of Intel's earning this week suggesting several strategies, including acquiring Texas Instruments Inc's (TXN.N) line of OMAP mobile processors, which would give the tech giant an established presence among smartphone and tablet manufacturers. Shah, who says he is usually not enthusiastic about large acquisitions, estimated the business could cost as much as $3 billion based on 2.5 times sales. ARM Holdings itself has been the subject of many rumors it could be bought by a big tech company, although such a move would make little business sense for the semiconductor company. Part of ARM's appeal is that it does not compete with its customers and instead licenses software to chipmakers across the industry. Selling ARM to any one customer such as Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (005930.KS), Qualcomm Inc (QCOM.O) and Texas Instruments Inc (TXN.N), would tip that delicate balance, bankers said. HEAD SCRATCHERS Intel recently spent $7.6 billion to buy cyber security company McAfee, hoping to build its security technology directly onto silicon chips as it prepares for a market where everything from cars to home appliances are connected by the Internet. Intel also recently completed the $1.4 billion purchase of Infineon's wireless business. CFO Stacy Smith told Reuters this week there will be no new deals while Intel digests those transactions. "What we did with buying Infineon's mobile business is it brings us modem technology, it brings us integration technology, it brings us an A-list of customers, so it's doing exactly what we need to do," Smith said. But some analysts and bankers scratch their heads over McAfee. "Everything they have talked about being able to integrate the capability into the chip etc, it is all nice marketing language, but net-net people are struggling to see how you implement that," one banker said. JPMorgan analyst Christopher Danely upgraded Intel to overweight following the company's earnings, although he still struggles to reconcile Intel's recent acquisition spree. "Intel might as well have bought Whole Foods," he said of the McAfee deal. Danely added that Intel's deals are not expected to resolve its problems in the tablet market, where they are third behind Nvidia and Qualcomm. CEO Otellini said Intel would not be blinded by its recent good fortune and will be "investing in developing new products for phones and tablets." But time is running out and Intel needs to deliver competitive mobile processors soon, the analysts and bankers said. This month, Intel introduced its newest processor aimed at tablets supporting Microsoft Corp's (MSFT.O) Windows 7, Android and its own MeeGo operating system. It has said it will appear in over 35 upcoming tablets and hybrid computers, but it is unclear how successful it will be. Microsoft's plans to make future versions of Windows 7 compatible with ARM is another reason why Intel needs to move faster to get into Microsoft devices, Shah said. "Once they pick their suppliers, it is going to be even more difficult for Intel to break through," Shah added. (Reporting by Nadia Damouni in New York and Noel Randewich in San Francisco; editing by Kenneth Li and Andre Grenon) reuters.com