Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lew Green who wrote (26139)	11/14/1997 4:23:00 PM
From: O. H. Rundell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Lew, My research tells me we're screwed. O. H.

To: Lew Green who wrote (26139)	11/14/1997 4:47:00 PM
From: KVASIR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

No ghosts in the shadows...The perception of your statement about the lawyers pouring over the release meticously, raised the caution flag for me....a statement of careful proofreading would have signaled all's well, just checking for errors-for the reasons you stated, which I totally agree....but meticulous scrutiny told me something wasn't up to par and they had to tiptoe in....as the release shows, the opt. levels are waaaaay below what we all thought they'd be.....actually they're about the same as MXAM's levels. So maybe Runyon didn't sell the mother lode and the payment to Phoenix is just value. The release just proved my questions, and HELL NO I'm not happy about! I would have much rather seen that the modified fire assay method produced the .49 opt. Maybe that will still come with further testing.....I did like the professionalism in IPM's release, and that they are marching on. I am dissappointed in your accusations that I was seeing ghosts in the shadows.....I asked you a concerned and courteous question, and expected the same, given your reputation on this post....I would have expected that response from mr. Charters