Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brent hyatt who wrote (26148)	11/14/1997 4:37:00 PM
From: Char	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Am I reading this correctly. The values listed are the results of a modified fire assay. I thought they were going to verify results of IPM's recovery process that was showing the .25 ox/ton. Dave

To: brent hyatt who wrote (26148)	11/14/1997 4:40:00 PM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

I guess it'll be pretty tough to get an uptick to short somemore..... sorry but had to get that in after the bashing I took.... After reading the report I would also question what values they expect to be able to recover using commercially viable recovery methods. The report stated, and I am not reading it so this may not be an exact quote, that the process used to get these values could NOT be used for commercial recovery. That would leave me to believe that the values that are recoverable thru a commercailly viable process would be much less. The report also stated that these values should not be used to estimate the size of an orebody.......This doesn't sound very good to me, but what would a stupid shorty like me know.