SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DRRISK who wrote (5059)11/14/1997 7:18:00 PM
From: Laserbones  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 11888
 
Everyone over on the hype thread knows so much more about aipn than anyone else who are we to even engage in a discussion with them?

Have some fun and count each instance where one of these intellectuals said that the JV is this week, or big news is coming tomorrow, or the "big picture" is only for a select few and no one else can understand. It's entertaining if nothing else.

The PA that is being speculated about should be a given--and this alone ain't gonna drive the stock into a higher trading range. The oil will do that at some point if it's there in quantity. I do wonder about how serious any "supposed" ongoing discussions with a major can be without having this info up front and on the table.

I'm sure there have been talks about partnerships, but without the fundamentals such as a PA with the Kasaks and solid data on the various structures, these talks probably weren't headed directly to the ink well. I think that's clear now.

It will soon be two months since the trading halt and aipn's admission that talks were underway. Hmmmmm, how's another 3 months sound? Be fine with me. I can wait and see.

(MP, how are those overworked synapses doing? I hope there hasn't been any irreversible binding across the cleft. But if there has been, don't worry, certain NTs are very time dependent and can be coaxed back to their little caves given the proper stimulus.)

Greg



To: DRRISK who wrote (5059)11/15/1997 8:38:00 AM
From: taxikid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11888
 
anyone-anyone- BUELLER?
ROFLMAO-
i never use that acronym unless i mean it-
you ain't bad that WAS funny
taxi- btw if u tell 3 friends and they tell 2 friends.....
there is a bridge here in bklyn- any interest?
maybe the aol classifieds will accept my ad....