Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tech who wrote (3268)	11/14/1997 7:27:00 PM
From: MACA	Respond to of 10786

If you spent 1% of your time researching real info instead of bad mouthing a real co. like Alydaar maybe people wouldn't call you DICK and you would find out that the figures they had given out a few months ago for '98 as $50mil are now updated to $125mil and changing as time goes on. Now you can plug in whatever expenses you want and tell us what kind of profit we'll see. I figured $90 to $100mil for '98 is that good enough for you?

To: tech who wrote (3268)	11/14/1997 8:06:00 PM
From: feltburner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10786

Tech: if you could get $100,000 rev. from each employee whom you were paying $40,000 (I believe that's the figure you used a while back), wouldn't you hire more employees? $50mm/500 staff = $100K rev/employee $100mm/1000 staff= $100k rev/employee What you call no growth I call $30mm extra to the operating income line. I join the others in making this my last post to you. People like you are on every thread I read; one thing I know for sure is that if you are right in your argument, all of us will be griping about the co. and admitting you were right. If we are right in our argument, you will disappear without a parting post. My bet is we'll only have to put up with you until Spring '98 at the latest. -Felt Burner