Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (607759)	4/14/2011 12:39:37 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583403

PPP's newest national poll finds that after a little more than 3 months in charge House Republicans have fallen so far out of favor with the American public that it's entirely possible Democrats could take control of the House back next year. The other day I saw a poll in which respondents expect that medicare/aid, ss, the military AND taxes go untouched...WTF?? I don't like these guys but...poll after poll shows that Americans have a completely unrealistic expectation of where we are as a country and what is reasonable to expect from its government...this kind of ignorance in the electorate does not bode well for the future of policy. Its been my concern right along. Its the same ignorance that got Bush elected in office for 8 long years. Europeans know more about what's happening in this country than many Americans.

To: Alighieri who wrote (607759)	4/14/2011 12:40:28 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1583403

Media Reaction to Obama's Speech When a President decides to inject himself into the conversation, he commands the stage. In addition to Jed Lewison's roundup from earlier today, here's more reaction to the President's speech. David Frum: How Ryan set up Obama's comeback “Whatever you do, don’t serve to his backhand.” “Don’t be nervous. I have the new Ryan serve. It’s bold!” “Trust me on this. Don’t serve to his backhand.” Thomp. Wham. EJ Dionne: There are at least four things to like about his approach. First, without mentioning Rep. Paul Ryan by name, he called out Ryan’s truly reactionary budget proposal for what it is: an effort to slash government programs, in large part to preserve and expand tax cuts for the wealthy. “That’s not right,” he said, “and it’s not going to happen as long as I’m president.” Second, he was willing to speak plainly about raising taxes, and he insisted correctly on restoring the Clinton-era tax rates for the wealthy. Tax reform, which he also proposed, is a fine idea, though there is ample reason for skepticism as to how much revenue it can produce. It would be far better to return to all of the Clinton tax rates and then build tax reform on that base, in particular through higher taxes on investment income. Third, he was right to focus on the need to cut security spending. Any serious effort to reduce the deficit cannot exempt defense. It’s laughable for Republicans to criticize defense cuts and then be utterly unwilling to increase taxes to pay for the defense they claim we need. Finally, he was eloquent in defending Medicare and Medicaid. He proposed saving money by building on last year’s heath-reform law. There are two ways to reduce the government’s heath-care expenses. One is Ryan’s path, which, Obama said, “lowers the government’s health-care bills by asking seniors and poor families to pay them instead.” The alternative, which the president rightly embraced, “lowers the government’s health-care bills by reducing the cost of health care itself.” Aaron Blake: How Obama used Paul Ryan President Obama may be criticized after his speech Wednesday for not providing many specifics about his plan to cut the national debt. What he will not be criticized for is being too soft on Republicans. The target of Obama’s speech was unmistakable, as the president used his pulpit at George Washington University to lay into the House Republican plan proposed by Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Andrew Sullivan has a nice roundup of his own, including Ezra Klein, Paul Krugman, and Jonathan Cohn: The new health care reforms sound very good upon initial inspection--and, particularly when added to cost controls already in the Affordable Care Act, this is far more serious than what Paul Ryan and the Republicans have in mind. And if Obama is more serious about controlling health care costs, then he's more serious about reducing deficits overall. Stephen Stromberg: Republicans already failed one test of whether they are serious about passing a debt-reduction plan: Against political and mathematical reality, House Speaker John Boehner (R) on Tuesday insisted that any proposal from the president that included any tax increase would be a "non-starter." Now here's another test of Republicans' sobriety on debt: Whether they start talking about "Death Panels" or "health-care rationing" again. This is going to generate a tremendous amount of reaction. Then again, that was the intent. dailykos.com

To: Alighieri who wrote (607759)	4/14/2011 1:13:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583403

Al, > I don't like these guys but...poll after poll shows that Americans have a completely unrealistic expectation of where we are as a country and what is reasonable to expect from its government...this kind of ignorance in the electorate does not bode well for the future of policy. Something has to give, Al. Can't promise everyone everything and just put the burden on the richest 5%. If you want to raise taxes, it has to be on everyone, not just those who can most easily dodge them. Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (607759)	4/14/2011 1:15:34 PM
From: Jim McMannis	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583403

RE:"The other day I saw a poll in which respondents expect that medicare/aid, ss, the military AND taxes go untouched...WTF?? I don't like these guys but...poll after poll shows that Americans have a completely unrealistic expectation of where we are as a country and what is reasonable to expect from its government...this kind of ignorance in the electorate does not bode well for the future of policy." And that's the side you're on.