SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Vennix who wrote (26221)11/14/1997 6:51:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir  Respond to of 35569
 
>>What happenned to BD?<<

Can you spell

R E D U N D A N T ? ? ?

<g>



To: Alan Vennix who wrote (26221)11/14/1997 8:29:00 PM
From: John Wetterau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Alan, thanks for your opinion that management was overly optimistic rather than intentionally misleading. You are probably right. Perhaps they found themselves a bit over their heads and are in the process of bringing in the help they need (Bateman). I'd just as soon hear them say that, but maybe in these days of spin I'm expecting too much. Not much reaction to the silver -- surprising -- worth 80% as much as the gold by my calculation. Also, I have to believe that the big shareholders have known what's been going on during the last few months. They don't seem to have bailed. It is possible that both shorts and longs are going to make money (in different time frames).
John



To: Alan Vennix who wrote (26221)11/14/1997 9:10:00 PM
From: Wildcat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
I still have to read the next 70 posts so bear with me if this is stated in future posts.

My spin on this is Bateman's role in this verification was to assay the head grade.

BD's role is to verify the IPM process and send these to labs for "processed" OPT.

So until we get the full report.....

Wildcat