SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (8940)11/14/1997 6:59:00 PM
From: TechMeister  Respond to of 97611
 
<<Yes... a p/e of 12 would be appropriate going forward with a company whose real growth rate would be
around 11%..... add two bucks, depending upon reliability of earnings/consistency.>>

11%..? You mean Quarterly sequential growth right?? CPQ has been growing earnings at a 40% annual rate. Where do you live, on Mars?

-TechM



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (8940)11/14/1997 7:24:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 97611
 
Joel,
If a price of 38 in your mind translates to a growth rate of 11%, please explain how you arrived at the 11% growth rate and how that squares with management's contention that they will get to 50 billion in revenues by Y2K... As TechM's post says, CPQ has been growing at a minimum of 4 times that rate. Are you forecasting a complete slowdown shortly? If so, why? The PC industry is still much more fragmented than microprocessors for instance. I think the numbers I saw recently showed that CPQ had a 19% share (but I don't remember if that was worldwide or US only) and that Dell was around half that. Assuming that these two pull away from the rest of the pack, that sounds like quite a bit of room to grow. Your argument is the same one that has been made for years. Look at component price drops and manufacturing/inventory efficiencies. Did you see Kai-Uwe's posting recently that says CPQ is making 15-20% even on the sub 1K pc? How do you explain expanding margins with all the price cutting going on? (Margins were UP in the latest quarterly report).

John

Yes all that cash is not generating the best returns, I'm sure management will put it to work in a timely manner. But the point is, you don't get 6 billion in the till without generating some nice profits, do you? Finally, even Intel, which has almost 90% of the microprocessor market, is growing faster (and is projected to continue to do so) than your forecast for CPQ. Comments?



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (8940)11/14/1997 7:54:00 PM
From: hpeace  Respond to of 97611
 
JOel, tandem will allow a 30 -100 billion dollar compnay to run completely off clinet server and micro based ERP's and alike..

no minis or mainframes needed....
didn't you know this??????
Out of curiousity???what is your profession..
It's not Info technology>>>>



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (8940)11/15/1997 12:24:00 PM
From: FRED TABBAL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Joel,

You seem to have been following the market for a while. Your analysis stinks!!! You have to excuse me on this one, but I strongly suggest you open an investment analysis book and read along for few days.

Based on your analysis, IBM would have a negative pe if you are applying a p/e of 12 to Compaq.

Cheers