SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (607997)4/18/2011 8:29:44 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583558
 
It is NOT common -- probably 0.1% or less, and the savings amount to 15% of the otherwise billable fee. In short, it is insignificant in amount.


Give it time...necessity is the mother of invention.

Last but certainly not least, if the medicare program is privatized and doctor fees are normalized to industry customary, the cost of health care for seniors would go through the roof ie: a HUGE shift of cost to then participant seniors would result, since they are the most expensive patients in the demographic spectrum.

Wrong, from start to finish. If the Medicare program is privatized, market forces will once again come into play.


I hadn't seen this summary by the CBO...but it's common sense even if the CBO wasn't saying it...but I forget that any you might have is overwhelmed by your hatred of government...

Moreover, CBO estimates that the total health care costs attributable to Medicare beneficiaries would be considerably higher under the private insurance plans they would purchase under the Ryan plan than under a continuation of traditional Medicare, because private plans have higher administrative expenses and higher payment rates for providers. Since the Ryan proposal would reduce the federal government's contribution for beneficiaries' health care costs even as it caused total costs to increase, beneficiaries' out-of-pocket spending would rise dramatically.

In 2022, the first year the voucher would apply, CBO estimates that total health care expenditures for a typical 65-year-old would be almost 40 percent higher with private coverage under the Ryan plan than they would be with a continuation of traditional Medicare. (See graph.) CBO also finds that this beneficiary's annual out-of-pocket costs would more than double — from $6,150 to $12,500. In later years, as the value of the voucher eroded, the increase in out-of-pocket costs would be even greater.

CBO wrote that "Paying more for health care would be particularly challenging for elderly people with less savings and lower income." [5] And Alice Rivlin said that she does not support Ryan's new proposal. Rivlin observed that it would result in a massive cost-shift over time to beneficiaries and that the growth rate Ryan set for his vouchers is "much, much too low" and "I don't think that's defensible."[6]


cbpp.org

Al