SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (127145)4/17/2011 2:13:06 AM
From: Skeeter Bug1 Recommendation  Respond to of 132070
 
Freedom, from my POV, it makes perfect sense.

project for a new american century (PNAC) called for a "new pearl harbor" in order to spur the agenda of the controlling class (they are the ones who sponsor things like PNAC. i don't have a "think tank" filled with politicos and industry execs working out my self interests for me, do you?).

i think we can both agree that it isn't what you think is rational, it what the controllers think is rational that matters, since they make the call.

voila, they got their "new pearl harbor" - the key to their goody bag, as it were.

it wasn't just about iraq - using tax payer dollars and lives to generate their corporate front war profits, corporate front war debt profits, corporate front agra profits (they raised the food and now only monsanto seeds can be used there), it was about destroying liberty in america and establishing enough FEAR in the minds of americans that they would gladly surrender their rights and liberties in the name of "safety."

the police state is the only mechanism the controllers have to keep their wealth from the serfs once they eventually pull the plug and the societal asset stripping mechanism starts doing the heavy work of separating society from its wealth and assets.

i'm not saying i know exactly who knew what when wrt to 911 - i sure don't. i am saying it is pretty obvious that the conspiracy theory put forth buy the corporate sponsored government is simply impossible and defies logic and rational thought.

here are some highlights.

1. in june of 2001, rumsfeld took the power to shoot down planes away from the boot on the ground commanders. this was completely new - and a requirement for 911 to have gone down the way it did. if rumsfeld was sleeping, well, nobody could stop hijacked planes. apparently, rumsfeld wasn't available that morning and the planes did their damage without being intercepted. several days after 911, the responsibility for shooting down hijacked airliners went right back to the boot on the ground commanders. mission accomplished.

2. building 7 fell uniformly at free fall acceleration for over 2 full seconds. that equates to a cross section 10 floors thick *instantaneously* vaporizing at the very same instant. there was no resistance. there were no supports to break, cement to break and crush - you get the idea. NIST admits this. demolition can do that. debris mostly hitting one side can't reasonably do that.

3. the news said the building 7 "unexpectedly" fell before it actually fell. someone knew something earlier than admitted.

4. there is video of a fireman saying "get back it's coming down" about 10 seconds before it came down. how did he know it was going to come down? was the source the same as the one who gave the news a heads up in advance?

5. larry silverstein said "the decision was made to pull it." the problem is, it was impossible to "pull it" without it having been pre set up with explosives. larry changed his tune once he "got the memo." it is clear what he meant, though and it relates perfectly with all the other information above.

6. there is no way a plane traveling at 500+ miles per hour could fit into a 20 foot hole. you saw what the plane did to the twin towers. the pentagon only had a 20 foot hole - and an open book with unburnt papers could be seen sitting on a stool right next to where the plane allegedly hit. a pentagon employee walked right out of the whole left by the "plane" - she's currently suing various entities.

7. the pentagon has tapes of what happened - but you'll never see them. believe me - they are classified for a reason.

8. there is absolutely no way that flight 93 landed in PA without a trace, all the while leaving credit card receipts of one of the stewardesses that left a phone message with her husband completely intact. yes, a more than paper thin receipt was unscathed, but the plane itself essentially disappeared. you saw the twin towers fires - can a credit card receipt inside that plane survive that kind of fire ball?

i'm not making this up...

here is the phone call that went to a recorder...

youtube.com

listen at the end...

and, voila, all her identification is in perfect order at the crash site that is, simply, missing the rest of the plane.

xoomer.virgilio.it

remember what the crash scene looked like...

extremedia.es

btw, that "slash" that looks like wings - that was there before the crater was created by something that highly doubt was an airliner that left unscathed credit card receipts.

this is even more absurd than the claim the FBI found a terrorist passport on the ground by the WTCes.

9. the fact building 7's first 6 floors blew up before either tower fell... two men were trapped in WTC 7 BEFORE the towers fell.

10. there just happened to be drills of terrorists flying planes around new york that day. just like there were drills of subway bombings on 7/7 exactly where the bombings occurred. you can see why drills would be convenient for an intelligence operation, no?

11. there was massive insider option trading linked to various defense department corporate types and the cia's buzzy krongard... but those records were destroyed to keep them from going public.

12. there is no physical explanation for why a collapsing building results in 1. the dustification of cement and 2. a massive pyroclastic cloud. physics just doesn't work that way. most of the heat from the plane was gone by the time the buildings came down. there were hot spots, but that doesn't explain how the building turned to fine dust particles when 95% of the building wasn't even office fire hot. and that pyroclastic cloud - the heat required make tons of material flow like that is incredible.

13. the nano thermite that the government refuses to test.

i could go on and on and on.

i just go by the evidence and there are simply too many absurdly unbelievable things that occurred for the Central State narrative to have been true. they are hiding too much information for their narrative to be true.

if you doubt any issue i've listed above, let me know and i will provide the details, pictures, whatever that supports the point.

remember, governments LOVE false flag attacks. operation northwoods was a plan that included assassinating people, blaming it on castro and using that as an excuse to illegally invade castro. the plan also called for deceptively using planes - you should read it. it also includes using drone planes and blowing up ships.

gwu.edu

infowars.com

of course, the plan was to use the media to perpetuate the lie and hope nobody questioned their "authority."

kennedy refused, his head was blown off with a zig azgging bullet, and operation northwoods went live under LBJ with both the fake guld of tonkin incident (never happened, 1-3 million vietnamese murdered, 58k americans murdered and 200k americans maimed - all based on a lie) and the USS liberty attack by isreal which they wanted to blame on egypt.

they are still doing false flag operations today - there was no accountability back then, so why not?

the latest false flag has the ATF selling guns to mexican drug cartels so they could use them to murder people and the Big Capital central state could then blame lax american gun laws for the deaths and work to restrict the 2nd amendment even more. fortunately, it back fired and decent people spoke up and told the world about this crime. i'm sure their careers are ended - that's how this game works.

the people at the top are psychopaths.

clinton's advisor wanted to sacrifice pilot to create pretext to go to war...

thenewamerican.com

here are advisors telling obama he needs terror in order to improve his ratings...

theblaze.com

prisonplanet.com

you might well be right 911 was an insane way to achieve their objectives. i don't think assuming sanity is a gimme in this criminal crowd of psychopaths.

northwoods, the gulf of tonkin, the uss liberty, building the bomb for the 1993 WTC attack - none of those things are rational. neither are their authors.

look at the physical evidence and then make a determination - whatever it is, it is. don't over think it from a rational POV - they just might not be rational in this area.