SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rzborusa who wrote (266900)4/18/2011 1:13:12 AM
From: Mahmoud MohammedRespond to of 275872
 
Mr Borusa,

Re: "If we set the way-back machine to 1999, the story is different ... So, the answer is yes AMD did surge
ahead of Intel. Intel had a better Threaten & Bribe Department."

Let's set the "Way-Back" machine even a little further back ... INTC was founded in 1968 while AMD was founded
in 1969. INTC founded by engineers, AMD founded by marketeers. This really tells the story:

Revenue 1987 ... INTC 1.49B$ ... AMD .99B$
Revenue 1990 ... INTC 3.17B$ ... AMD 1.05B$
Revenue 2000 ... INTC 30.2B$ ... AMD 4.38B$
Revenue 2010 ... INTC 43.6B$ ... AMD 6.46B$

Mahmoud



To: rzborusa who wrote (266900)4/18/2011 11:05:51 AM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
the answer is yes AMD did surge ahead of Intel. Intel had a better Threaten & Bribe Department.

When AMD has better products they prosper. When AMD has worse products they suffer. It's really not very complicated.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News