Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Senior who wrote (42322)	6/19/2011 11:27:28 AM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78595

Rosetta Resources [t]ROSE[/t]: positive article in Barron's: I show I began acquiring shares about 4/10. As stock has risen, I added to build a full position: my high buy was at $49 (3/11) and most recently (4/11) at $42.85. I made one small sale in May. I liked the original Rosetta write-up in Barron's last June, and this new update gives me some confidence to continue holding shares. If Rosetta does continue to perform as the article suggests it might, I may add yet more shares if stock resumes its uptrend and goes over $50. online.barrons.com Things just keep getting better and better at Rosetta Resources. As readers of these pages may recall, Houston-based Rosetta (ticker: ROSE) is a smallish oil-and-gas outfit run by a team of seasoned execs who left top jobs at industry giants like ConocoPhillips to strike out on their own. What they were eager to build, as Barron's explained in a thumbs-up story ("Resourceful Rosetta," June 14, 2010), was a company that could exploit unconventional energy sources like shale. At the time, the stock was 25. It got as high as 51 earlier this month and closed Friday at 42.98. The juice for the strong performance has been Rosetta's remarkable transformation from a run-of-the-oil-patch producer into a potential powerhouse, thanks to the speed and efficiency with which it is moving to exploit its vast acreage in two of the country's most promising shale plays. One is the Southern Alberta Basin in northern Montana, conceivably the next big thing if it proves an extension of the enormously productive Williston Basin to the east. Rosetta holds 300,000 acres. An even more important catalyst has been the astonishing pace of development in the Eagle Ford in South Texas. From virtually nothing a year ago, output last quarter spurted to 89 million cubic feet equivalent a day, almost 60% of total production. Even after divestitures, year-end output should jump to 185-195 MMcfe/d—with the Eagle Ford chipping in a whopping 80% of that. Production from these wells has put them on a pace to outstrip early estimates of what they will yield over their lifetimes, a benchmark already ratcheted up from four billion cubic feet equivalent to 7.2 Bcfe. Output is low-cost and liquids-rich, so margins are expanding apace. And it's just the beginning: Rosetta has drilled only 7% of its prospects in a field that accounts for less than half of its 65,000-acre Eagle Ford stake. Moreover, while current wells recover a mere 14% of the hydrocarbons in the ground, Rosetta believes that it eventually might recover as much as 25% by drilling more wells closer together. Fueled by the Eagle Ford, earnings are expected to hit $1.80 a share this year and $3.30 next, while cash flow is pegged at just under $6 a share this year and close to $9 in 2012. Meanwhile, in the Alberta Basin, Rosetta has drilled 11 vertical test wells spread across its vast acreage. John Clayton, its vice president of asset development, says that the company has found "large accumulations of oil in every well." Significantly, Rosetta has shelved the idea of a partner, choosing instead to drill three horizontal wells on its own dime, says CEO Randy Limbacher, because "we like what we see so much." Rosetta's stock is going for about seven times this year's estimated cash flow and under five times 2012's. It sells well below a net asset value of $60 to $65, which by no means fully reflects the terrific potential of the Alberta Basin. Should that play pan out, the stock could double. -- Rhonda Brammer