Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Knight who wrote (26279)	11/14/1997 9:14:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Robert >Yes it was not what we expected< I'm proud to write that I think you and I agree. I think it was our fault that we expected what we did and then were disappointed. First of all I think the institutions have understood for a long time just what would be announced and it was very positive for them. I think someone will step up and we might still see our squeeze. I have great confidence that they can recover the .25 and (only) frequently get it in the assays. I am disappointed that Bateman could not yet sign off (belive they have it) on their results and the new process. I did think it was amazing that they did allow their name to be used in a guarantee of metal present. The next few weeks will see a lot come out about this deal (IMO). Maybe they will start releasing more assay results, etc. I think a lot of little investors are going to panic, put in market sells and loose their but. I say decent odds of between $4 and $15 within 10 days. I have never seen so many aggressive shorters on any thread stomping on people like they are tonight. I understand they have the right to, they help the market, etc. I tend to associate them with rapists, etc.... not a perfect world. A lot of little people could finanically killed because they get too scarred and can't sit it out.