Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Verde Agritech -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: potashpro who wrote (6680)	4/21/2011 11:02:42 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16592

There was no statistical difference in productivity and quality of carrot between treatments using ThermoPotash (TK) and potassium chloride (KCl) and combined application of these two sources, This is a problem with English... using ThermoPotash (TK) and* potassium chloride (KCl)* should read using ThermoPotash (TK) OR potassium chloride (KCl) otherwise saying the combined ... combined application of these two sources, makes no sense.. so we have the equivalency.. seems to me... IMO

To: potashpro who wrote (6680)	4/21/2011 11:04:59 AM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16592

Potashpro. From the release: "There was no statistical difference in productivity and quality of carrot between treatments using ThermoPotash (TK) and potassium chloride (KCl) and combined application of these two sources, and also compared to the control treatment." That depends what the "control treatment" included. If it was just water and baseline soil, then you are right. That would imply no potash of any kind was needed to get the equivalency of TK OR TK plus KCL ... that does not make sense to me. -M