Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Verde Agritech -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (6753)	4/21/2011 4:56:18 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 16592

I still can't get my head around how they managed to prove the null hypothesis re. KCl though. Yes as icecream pointed out I left out the control group... admittedly I was fixated on the KCL vs TK issue... and that is odd as he/she rightfully pointed out... why bother with potash... BUT... regular potash apparently washes away too fast as I recall (I am sure ;O) nationalpost.com .. so upshot is... if granularity prevented proper dissolving of TK product and the KCL washed away too easily as is its wont.. null hypothesis and Bob's your uncle.. and it all is logical if not happy.. assuming granularity (guessing pellets too big... smaller pellets equals much larger total surface area and absorption potential) issue is tweakable.. we are fine.. as I mentioned in a PM to someone.. on 700K shares I am surprised this didn't settle a lot lower..