Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (149951)	4/22/2011 11:37:15 PM
From: ChanceIs	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 206093

>>>I cannot tell from your post whether you agree or disagree with the statement above.<<< TeeVee wrote...No QE 3 is needed and here is why. About $1.2 trillion in treasuries are due over the next 12-18 months and the money will be printed to redeem them. I disagree. The redemptions WILL NOT require new money printing, as I argued. Rather just a roll out. Many argue that QEII will end and then reemerge as QEII Lite with the Fed keeping its balance sheet at its current level by simply rolling over the current holdings. Financing the new deficits will take additional customers at auction or more money printing. With a forecast deficit of $1.6 trillion this year, I am not expecting the money printing to be put on hold. I think that we will have $1 trillion plus deficits for the nest five years at least. Of course the economic system can't survive at those levels of deficits.