Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (608847)	4/25/2011 9:02:39 AM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576167

>> We know Greenstock is wrong because if Bush had KNOWN there were no WMD, he wouldn't have invaded. This is an often-overlooked point, but one that is quite obviously true on its face. If he had KNOWN there were no WMD there were plenty of other good reasons for the invasion. He would certainly have known that if WMD were NOT found it would be highly destructive for his presidency. Thus, by any reasonable expectation, had he KNOWN there were no WMD, he would have made some other reason the basis for the invasion. Not to mention he had been advised by his CIA director it was a "slam dunk". People who claim he went to war under false pretenses are being far more out of touch with reality than, for example, the birthers.