Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Verde Agritech -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (6835)	4/25/2011 9:58:35 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16592

oh I still have questions also.. and will looking for more details on further tests..

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (6835)	4/25/2011 10:27:11 AM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16592

Terry, I think the point they were making is they wanted to test it in real world conditions. Removing the residual potash would have negated that. Clearly what they were hoping for, was the crops that were given the TK alone to perform better than both the controls and those with KCL alone. That would have shown that TK alone had a beneficial effect in both situations inreal works conditions. If they were to run this test again, I would add a 4th, 5th and 6th arm all in nutrient deprived soil. These would be TK alone, KCL alone and TK PLUS KCL -- all with the reformulated granules. - M