Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (73540)	4/25/2011 12:00:32 PM
From: alpine_climber	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218872

I'm sorry I worded my communications poorly, and it is quite rightly my own lack of confidence, which in turn is part of my past. But it was no way a royal we, and I have done my level best to sound out my own bullish views on China, including 'pounding the table' on CZM. But again, there are worries, it does not offer a free ride....hence my distributing materials from marketwatch, etc. As for precious metals, I do try to do more than my able homework on investing successfully in this difficult market, and sharing precious information 'gems' that I find with this thread, but I feel the biggest problem is lack of transparency on who the current 'mover' buyers and sellers are, and while I do suspect they recently include central banks (of Emerging Markets, oil rich countries), SWFs, pension funds, endowments, I like everyone else, have failed to find firm evidence of same. That indeed was my intended 'added value' of my post. Never mind, my apologies for poor communications, I will try harder at communicating better, and sharing. I suspect too much sun, potent red wine, driving too many miles for my own good without enough sleep earlier today may have added to this bad performance/behaviour.