Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (33113)	4/25/2011 1:45:06 PM
From: Brumar89	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36921

You don't know the first thing about the CAGW theory you champion. An assumed positive feedback from more water vapor is a key part of the theory (it's hilarious btw that you don't know this basic fact) since it's known that CO2 alone can't produce a big enough rise in temperatures to be catastrophic. That's why NASA's finding an apparent negative feedback is so significant .... it falsifies the whole theory. About the claim I'm a flat earther etc .... thats funny since people on your side of this issue are blaming every drought, hurricane, snowstorm, tsunami, earthquake on CAGW. You guys apparently believe the earth was perfectly stable prior to Edwin Drake drilling that well in PA.