Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (5595)	11/15/1997 2:11:00 AM
From: citydi	Respond to of 20681

Dear Alan & Lawrence, Thanks for both of your very nice posts. Lawrence, you are probably right about another buying opportunity - :) my heart will just have to take it. And Alan - yes, we may 'go' down but we are not out! I have to believe. Have a great weekend everyone. Citydi

To: Alan Vennix who wrote (5595)	11/15/1997 9:02:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Alan, I also agree with you. Ipm is not a scam. There is irrefutable proof of the presence of PMs. How much is not yet known and will take longer to determine than was previously thought. As has been previously expressed on this thread, all the dirts are essentially R&D companies as opposed to mining companies at this point. It is very difficult to do R&D in the public forum. I can assure you that Intel didn't have to publicize every set back when they were perfecting(?) the Pentium chip. (sorry, Mac lover at heart) they didn't have every move scrutinzed by a bunch of pshycos on a thread every step of the way like we do here. IPM may or may not effect Naxos in the short term, but they are no scam, and ultimately we will succeed or fail on our own merits. Mark Henry skill position players may be beneath intellectual contempt, but so are bond traders..............