SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (424042)4/28/2011 6:19:34 PM
From: Nadine Carroll7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794376
 
Is it a forgery? *UPDATED*

Gateway Pundit has amassed a fair amount of evidence that the birth certificate is a manipulated document.

bookwormroom.com


The video is fairly convincing that it was manipulated, and not skillfully. Leaving the links on the clipboard was sloppy, or else somebody is messing with our heads (I vote for sloppy). I'd like some other sources to confirm that, however. I don't have Illustrator myself, or I'd do it.

Well, that would explain defending the lawsuits. Wouldn't want to go on oath with a forged certificate, would you? I'm sure somebody is trying to figure out right now how to get this document into a court case.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (424042)4/28/2011 6:24:03 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 794376
 
I don't know what to make of this. The AP scanned a document correctly right? He doesn't deny that. The WH screwed up their scan royally but there's no material difference between the relevant data on both. Is there?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News