SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Klaus Brandt who wrote (26403)11/15/1997 10:07:00 AM
From: Char  Respond to of 35569
 
That's good Klause, stay positive. Have you been calling any moose lately?

Dave



To: Klaus Brandt who wrote (26403)11/15/1997 3:31:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower  Respond to of 35569
 
Klaus >The consistant fire assay is a milestone and a plus, we'll just have to wait for further PR's which I feel will be VERY positive! I liked the report, but not the reaction of the many posters here. We have to wait for the recovery report, which will be more like the AGM annoucement.<

IMO and KISS (keep it simple stupid) EXACTLY. Not enough of the posters (investors) understand the technical stuff. (including me). Unfortunately, I suspect IPM assumed they did.

Joe



To: Klaus Brandt who wrote (26403)11/15/1997 8:11:00 PM
From: Theo  Respond to of 35569
 
Klause, Nice to see a level head. I agree that the recovery method is different then the fire assay. They even say it in the report. Even at fire assay numbers, there is plenty of minerals to mine. Remember that the asays don't go down to 700 meters in the middle. We now have a way to measure how much there is in the middle, that even the TSE will agree to!!!
Theo


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News