SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (103938)5/1/2011 2:31:40 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224741
 
duplicate



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (103938)5/1/2011 2:31:40 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224741
 
The area is north of Pittsburgh, but that doesn't matter as the State of Pennsylvania Laws dictate probate of an estate of a deceased individual, not a county or city.

Generally the will of the deceased is followed unless contested or it violates probate laws of the state.
The problem seems to be the will was contested and a judge followed the request of the deceased that some assets if any would be divided by Sharia or Islamic law.

It seems to me the request of the deceased should be followed if it doesn't violate state law. I am not familiar with Pennsylvania's Probate laws or the spousal rights of a deceased individual.

The greater problem is the higher courts decision that secular courts may not make determinations regarding religious laws or practices. Sharia Law and Islamic Law have many interpretations and no singular meaning. In other words some sects may view them differently and our courts are not allowed to determine which is correct.

Seems to me the part or parts of the will that are clear will likely be followed and those assets to be divided by Islamic or Sharia Law will be parceled by the state's probate laws for "Intestate Succession" or as if a will was not written to cover those assets.

That is how I see this ending.