SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David L. who wrote (5972)11/15/1997 11:36:00 AM
From: PAL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13594
 
A stock can go up and have no earnings.

Is is not the name of the game EARNINGS? One does not invest in a company that lose money year after year. There are exceptions of course, like Nextel and Quest because they are spending for the infrastructure and the benefit will come later after the foundation is in place.

On the other hand AOL is the dominant and established player. Yet it cannot pay its bills (negative working capital). AOL is an OK company but not the these nosebleed level.

Merril Lynch upgraded the stock but I have not seen the reason for it. Yet that upgrade is just lukewarm: near term accumulate from neutral. Maybe professional courtesy to Goldman Sachs $ 350 M convertible subordinated debenture st 4% and conversion price of $ 104.



To: David L. who wrote (5972)11/15/1997 3:24:00 PM
From: Brent D. Beal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
Nice analysis--"the stock can go up or it can go down". . .

I think the investing community is starting to realize that the pie-in-the-sky justification for AOL's 300+ p/e is no longer justifiable and hence, I believe the stock is going down. . .

Every once in a while you need an opinion, at least in my opinion. . .