Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (424650)	5/2/2011 7:13:25 PM
From: Bridge Player	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793900

The administration insists their first choice was to capture him alive. Typical administration insanity. Whatever the strike force did, or Osama did or didn't do, there is very little to criticize about this mission. As someone posted earlier, this came off like a Mitch Rapp mission. en.wikipedia.org

To: DMaA who wrote (424650)	5/3/2011 2:43:32 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793900

Now the WH is saying bin Laden wasn't armed. How does this mesh with their claim their first choice was to capture him? Is their story changing? Is the seal that shot him in trouble? White House: bin Laden not armed when killed WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House says Osama bin Laden was not armed when a Navy SEAL raiding party confronted him during an assault on his compound in Pakistan. White House press secretary Jay Carney acknowledged that bin Laden did not have a weapon even though administration officials have said that bin Laden resisted during the raid. hosted.ap.org